• Excel@lemming.megumin.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Yes, right next to the fields for your full name and address, all of which are optional. It’s a total nothingburger.

    • alakey@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Idk how many times we have to go over preemptive compliance with fascism before you all get it 🤦

      Don’t expect any help when the field is enforced with a TPM signed by MS, otherwise 95% of the web won’t let you in, because you can’t verify with your government ID linked phone app that needs an OS level verification step.

    • Senal@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Oh damn i didn’t realise there was something comparable already in there.

      Do you have the associated laws that precipitated those changes, i can’t seem to find any reference to them ?

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Probably because he was doing it in earnest compliance with government surveillance. There’s no other reason to implement this now. I don’t feel bad for him; he knew exactly what he was doing.

        In and of itself, it’s not a bad feature, but I don’t think it needs to be added, let alone right now.

    • Ooops@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Wait? Aren’t we also boykotting passwd because it has an optional field for your complete real name?