Timestamps:

00:00 Intro

00:42 Sponsor: Internxt

02:26 Microsoft 365 runs on Linux through Wine now

04:44 Mint will ship more of their own application

07:07 Ubuntu completes its move to Rust coreutils

09:37 Steam Frame revealed, up for signups

13:04 GNOME 51 released

14:54 GNOME Shell Mobile seems in a weird place

17:44 Flatpak working on app services

19:47 Improvements for the Linux kernel

21:52 AMDv3 images provide a nice boost to low end hardware

23:48 OpenAI discloses worrying cheating behavior in its models

26:37 A few gaming things

29:15 Sponsor: Tuxedo Computers

  • anguo@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    The only thing I miss on Linux is to be able to fill government PDFs.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      18 hours ago

      That’s great but my work uses Office and the PWAs suck ass.

      Actually I’d call the Outlook PWA slightly better than the Windows desktop client. But that bar isn’t very high.

  • NGC2346@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I can live with OnlyOffice for the time being, and i know it has ties to Russia or something, but for what i use Office for, its fine.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I don’t get it? Are you upset that business-oriented distros aren’t building for hardware that’s no longer being built?

      Surprised Pikachu.

      Their customers are businesses who are almost always running modern hardware. There’s no significant reason to expect them to compile i386 binaries in 2026, because no enterprise customer is using i386…largely because there’s no good reason to, when more capable processors that consume less power are more readily available.

      Same thing for x86-64.

      Nothing stopping you from compiling from source tho.

      • db2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Where has anyone except you talked about any expectation to compile for i386? Go away.