Because that’s the French word for it, a visioconférence.

It has a lot of trackers: https://reports.exodus-privacy.eu.org/en/reports/com.tribab.tricount.android/latest/

You’re right, my bad.

Or netbird if you want something non US.

You could use Blocky for this. It can do both, apply some block lists and use DoT/DoH resolvers.

I liked this explanation:

https://alexyorke.github.io/2025/06/29/list-is-a-monad/

Well the causality is obvious here.

Can you explain how to make it work for this use case?

There is no need to pay for an external service for this and I don’t think Mullvad would work for this use case.

There are some examples of projects that use CleanURLs db in its readme but most have not been updated for a long time.

There are plenty of sites that use more than one parameters. It’s true that a lot of sites now use the history API instead of url parameters but you can still find plenty, and you have no garante about the parameters order. Any site with a search page that have a few options will probably use url parameters instead of the history API. It’s easier to parse and will end up being shorter most of the time.

Well for youtube it’s quite easy, there are only 4 useful parameters that I can think of, the video id v, the playlist id list and index if it’s a playlist and the time t if you’re sending a specific time in the video. Everything else can be removed. Here’s what uBlock Origin with the AdGuard URL Tracking filter list:

! Youtube
$removeparam=embeds_referring_euri,domain=youtubekids.com|youtube-nocookie.com|youtube.com
$removeparam=embeds_referring_origin,domain=youtubekids.com|youtube-nocookie.com|youtube.com
$removeparam=source_ve_path,domain=youtubekids.com|youtube-nocookie.com|youtube.com
||youtube.com^$removeparam=pp

There is no logic as to which parameters is useful and which is used for tracking. But there are databases.

Here is the one for the CleanURLs extension and here is the one for the AdGuard URL Tracking filter list (which I recommend everyone should enable in uBlock Origin).

I did: a) as said elsewhere in this post steam auto update, the package version is not relevant. b) this is 5 years old.

I don’t think you should trust it more.

The link you posted is about using steam with NTFS and the installation method has nothing to do with it.

Even after reinstalling steam with the steam.deb file it shows the same error

I never heard that and never installed Steam without a package manager. Be careful not to listen to everyone’s advices.

I’ve never seen the !0 and !1, it is dumb and indicates either young or terrible devs.

Boolean(window.chrome) is the best, !!window.chrome is good, no need to test if it’s equal to true if you make it a boolean beforehand.

I don’t understand why but OK.

That would be very weird. I gather that Mint use Ubuntu’s packages so it should be OK. Did you try it?