• dwt@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Why would I prefer this, if I can get more packages with something like nix - which also works everywhere, but I get reproducibility and gitops on top?

    • isakBSD@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Choose Nix if:

      • Reproducibility is critical (dev → prod same environment)

      • You want a GitOps workflow (config as code, versioned)

      • Rollbacks on failure matter (atomic updates)

      Choose Void if:

      • You want to learn traditional Linux without abstractions

      • Fast package management and lightweight system are priorities

      • Systemd avoidance is a goal in itself

      Void is a better Linux distro. Nix is a better infrastructure tool. They solve different problems.

      You were right from the start – if reproducibility and GitOps count, Nix is the only option. Void can’t deliver that.

      • girlpower@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Why be productive with your computer when you can spend your time refactoring your NixOS configs into a dendritic pattern?

        Half-joking. I use NixOS and I enjoy it, but I’m not gonna pretend I don’t spend a lot of time managing it (not that it needs managing per se). I obviously enjoy doing that though.

        As for systemd avoidance, there’s also Guix which uses Scheme and their own init (Shepherd I think). It looks pretty cool, but I went with Nix anyway since it’s so much more popular. There’s also the fact that Guix Systems is an FSF approved distribution which means that discussing proprietary Guix channels is strictly forbidden, which while admirable gets kind of old quickly.