88
There's no such thing as Just a Tool | deadSimpleTech
deadsimpletech.comHeidegger thinks about tools like so: a tool is something (a thing that has being in the Heideggerian sense, not necessarily an object) that represents an extension of human capabilities in some way. A tool is thus any kind of thing that *lets you do something you wouldn't otherwise have been able to*. The important (for us) conceptual leap here is that when a tool works well, or isn't broken, it develops what Heidegger describes as a "ready-to-hand" quality: the tool fades into the background as a kind of human-tool gestalt of a human with the additional capability afforded by a tool forms. As a simple example of this, consider eating with a fork. When the fork is well-designed and not broken, *you don't explicitly have "I am using a fork" in your conscious mind while eating dinner*.



This actually reflects beautifully irl. A hoe is a hoe is not shovel. A hoe is good a tiling a (small) field while a shovel is not but is good at shoveling. But they can be used for a lot of cases interchangeably. Same goes for cat, cp, dd.
But if you scale this up, there’s suddenly not one kind of harrow, and each is specialized and forms not only the result, but also how you work with it. Same with frameworks and LLM.