The creators of SponsorBlock did it again, now we can crowdsource better titles and thumbnails as well. I just tried it with LinusTechTips who is a worst offender when it comes to clickbait and its really great.

Compare without DeArrow

and with the extension

  • RadioRat@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 year ago

    Clickbait has this singular capacity to make one feel treated as a simple primate. Such a relieving comparison.

  • Powderhorn@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Holy shit! This is amazing! But how will I ever know what’s REALLY IMPORTANT without ALL CAPS and a shitton of BANGS?!?!?!?!?!?!?

  • SmugBedBug@lemmy.iswhereits.at
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The removal of the custom thumbnail is refreshing. No more wired reactions with an arrow pointing at something.

    I’m going to give this a try. The sponsorblock people have great ideas!

  • Nimfi@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    love that this is a thing, hate that it HAD to be a thing, i wish youtubers would stop doing this corny ass shit it makes the site so unbearable to browse lmao

      • Nimfi@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        yeah, and lots of them have youtube as a source of income as well so i get why they would want to. just sucks i guess.

      • jadenity@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly. I watch a lot of YouTubers who don’t really like having to make clickbait, but it’s the algorithm that promotes it, so they need to conform to what works.

  • athalean@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve already noticed a couple videos where the corrected title made me more interested in the video than the clickbait title. Hope this extension takes off!

    • Pechente@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s how it is most of the time for me. I unsubbed from LTT because their clickbaity videos made it hard for me to see what I’m interested in. With this extension I might actually start watching their stuff again.

  • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This made me realize how much I hate the YouTube metagame.

    It would be awesome if this could be ported to ReVanced

  • obsoulete@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I tried it. It works well. But, I don’t think I will use it, because I usually know YouTubers to avoid when it comes to clickbaiting. Looking at you, Scotty Kilmer. :)

  • pdlrd://@terefere.eu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Feels like we’re back on youtube in its early form, more organic. great idea i’m downloading it

  • Grimace@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    It seems no matter how many channels I block there’s always more annoying eyesore thumbnails, so this is fantastic.

  • ehrenschwan@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Given that SponsorBlock is in Youtube ReVanced, do you think this will be included in ReVanced in the Future?

    • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was genuinely surprised how well SponsorBlock works. I was assuming it to skip the sponsored sections only on accounts with millions of subscribers but in reality it almost never fails.

  • Holzkohlen@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    After Mastodon and Lemmy I think need a federated youtube alternative now too. Yes, I know PeerTube exists, I just need it to get a nice boost in attention just like the other got.

      • Holzkohlen@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I know. They use peer-to-peer, hence the name PeerTube, that means while you are watching a video, you also upload that video for others to see. Granted the concept falls flat with so little users as there is never another person watching the exact same video at the exact same point it time, but in theory it should scale up.
        I think we could also have a standalone desktop application to watch and seed. In the browser you stop seeding as soon as you close the tab, but with the desktop application you could allow for further seeding. People who want to keep the platform alive could practically donate their upstream traffic. I would.
        I wish people would use it more cause I like the concept a lot.

        • knokelmaat@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          The concept still works with almost no users. If you’re the only one watching a video, the original host is more than capable of serving it to you and so no need for extra peers ;).

          Being able to handle a small amount of users isn’t the problem, it’s once a lot of users suddenly join in that the system would collapse without the peer functionality.

          Also, peer tube is not fully decentralized. All videos need to be stored on an instance (similar to torrent seedboxes) so there will always be at least one direct source available. So I don’t think that standalone app as you describe is needed. (That would be interesting though in a fully decentralized model, without any instances but all videos just floating between peers. But that would have the danger of creating dead videos similar to dead torrents)

        • ShittyKopper [they/them]@lemmy.w.on-t.work
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I assume that in the short term transcoding is also going to become an issue. Most fedi servers are being hosted on cloud providers like Hetzner, DO, Linode, etc. who do not have any kind of encoding hardware, and modern codecs like VP9 or god forbid AV1 are horribly slow to encode without HW acceleration.

          I know there are several platforms that do offer it (Amazon and Google do AFAIK) but those can still get pretty expensive, and there is a sizeable chunk of people here who may not want their content to reach Amazon or Google.

  • Icarus@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I really like this, and I will probably use it, but I hate clickbate thumbnails with a passion and avoid them as much as I can.