☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 5 days agoPride Versioninglemmy.mlexternal-linkmessage-square35fedilinkarrow-up1580arrow-down13
arrow-up1577arrow-down1external-linkPride Versioninglemmy.ml☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square35fedilink
minus-squareSwedneck@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up4·4 days agoeither have meaning to the number and do semantic versioning, or don’t bother and simply use dates or maybe simple increments
minus-squareRogue@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 days agoDate based version numbers is just lazy. There’s nothing more significant about a release in two weeks (2025.x.y) than today (2024.x.y). At least with pride versioning there’s some logic to it.
minus-squareSwedneck@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 days agothe point is just to have a way to tell releases apart, if every release is version 5 then you’re going to start self harming
either have meaning to the number and do semantic versioning, or don’t bother and simply use dates or maybe simple increments
Date based version numbers is just lazy. There’s nothing more significant about a release in two weeks (2025.x.y) than today (2024.x.y).
At least with pride versioning there’s some logic to it.
the point is just to have a way to tell releases apart, if every release is version 5 then you’re going to start self harming