• HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    130
    ·
    2 days ago

    Clown on JS all you like, but if git was perfect within a week of creation, why does it receive updates? 🤔

    • OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      88
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Those were all written prior to release as a way to ensure git could grow and evolve with its userbase.

      • HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Sorry, the sarcasm didn’t come through. My joke was that no software is perfect because software is constantly evolving as people’s needs and desires change.

        • OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          53
          ·
          2 days ago

          Sorry, the sarcasm didn’t come through. My joke was that no software is perfect because software is constantly evolving as people’s needs and desires change.

          • Shrouded0603@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Sorry, the sarcasm didn’t come through. My joke was that no software is perfect because software is constantly evolving as people’s needs and desires change.

    • ursakhiin@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The post isn’t claiming perfection. It’s claiming production ready. Very different things.

      The confusion there is the claim that good/perfect means done. It means ready for use and extensible.

      Note: I’m not agreeing/disagreeing with the claim. Just clarifying the point