• bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Only git wasn’t done in 10 days. It was very quickly able to track its own development, but it still took Linus half a year of thinking to be able to make git.

    (No, sorry, I can’t find the interview that would validate that claim.)

      • Rogue@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        And it sounds like somebody on the kernel team reverse engineered the internals of bit keeper so they would have a clear understanding of precisely how it worked - but more importantly the ways that it didn’t suit their workflow

    • Fijxu@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      2 days ago

      I was going to say this. Linus took some months to think about the design of Git before even writing it.

    • mmddmm@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      And it would still benefit for taking a week to formally define its interface before Linus started coding.

      Also, basic is famous for being already fully specified and mostly stolen from other people’s work.