Is BSD, More “Free” than Linux?

  • s_s@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    First off I’d like to point out you are asking to compare a family of distributions to a kernel. Not quite a 1-to-1 comparison.

    Sustinctly: BSD licenses are more permissable for developers, GPL licenses (aka Linux) are better at preseving freedoms past developers have handed down to us.

    As a non-developer end user, both are about the same, although because of the nature of the GPL, you can find a wider bredth of free software for it in 2023.

    • somegeek@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      undefined> First off I’d like to point out you are asking to compare a family of distributions to a kernel. Not quite a 1-to-1 comparison.

      thanks for the explanation

  • maxamillion@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s a lot of nuance there. I assume you mean BSD License vs GPLv2 … technically yes because you can literally do whatever you want with BSD License code BUT it doesn’t protect freedom either so kind of no.

    • aport@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      With permissive licensing, freedom applies to the user as they are free do to whatever they like even if that means making the software non-free.

      With copyleft, freedom applies to the software and restrictions are placed on the user so the software’s freedom is upheld.

    • Jim@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think you’ve succinctly described what I hate about GPL. I could never put my finger on it except that it’s a pain the butt.