• wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    So my bad, I didn’t clock the PPA abbreviation being about the experimental adtech bullshit they pulled.

    But I feel like my point still stands. Claims that Mozilla is harvesting user data should be (relatively) easily proven by audits of the source code. Disproving things tends to be harder, and I’m not the person making the claim.


    I’m not “gatekeeping” shit. I’m saying that bold claims should have facts backing them up, and so far I’ve not been shown anything to back it up.

    (Edit: to be clear, the claim that these local AI features would be an increase in user data being harvested)

    You appear to have strong feelings about this, so I was hoping you had more than specious claims based entirely off a major gaffe.

    I’m not saying that Firefox and Mozilla should get trust by default. I’m saying that if they are doing shit as heinous as what you claimed, there should be evidence that can be pointed to.

    Even something as simple as “hey, their prepackaged versions aren’t reproducable by compiling the source code”.

    There are enough people who care a lot about this, and the source code is right there. No one should have to speculate on any of what Mozilla is or isn’t doing here as it’s all out in the open.

    • XLE@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Apology accepted.

      Crazy how Mozilla has done so much stuff that people just forgot