• AnonTwo@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That’s a “if you’re having problems” not a “This is the intended limit”

    Hell it doesn’t even say how many tabs they intended to support. This could very well fall into an optimization issue. Which you know, could improve things for everyone including potential users who may want to jump to firefox.

    • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes because computers and their capabilities vary immensely. How could they know what your pc is capable of versus someone else’s?

      This exactly explains that there are limits to the amount of tabs a system can handle. 300+ is not a normal amount for any system and definitely falls outside of normal use case testing.

      The optimization issue is you and op not using your brains.

      • AnonTwo@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        limits that they’re not exhibiting in other browser software.

        I’m kindof shocked you still can’t see the issue there. That they’re not pulling this case out of thin air but rather it’s how they used their browser previously.

        I mean maybe we just want to say Chromium has better tab management under the hood. Or we can see if something can be improved. Especially because as hardware improves and more users are enabled to being able to open more tabs this should become more glaring, not less.