I think you mean “$EDITOR”. Gotta have that variable expansion.
I think you mean “$EDITOR”. Gotta have that variable expansion.
Am I being dense? I don’t get it.
Unix -> Linux -> Ferrix?
I don’t understand any of these analogies at all
For practical purposes, it’s probably good enough. You could write a program to check whether it’s non-repeating up to N digits, so just set N high enough that it will last you for a few thousand releases…
I learned MIPS as an undergrad. Pretty neat little RISC architecture.
I have a similar story. I started a new job and inherited a ball of mud written in Python while the creator was out for a few weeks. When he got back, he was grumpy about my changes. I guess he preferred it with more bugs 🤷♂️
Get out of my office
I mean technically I could write an interpreter that assigns semantics to HTML constructs.
Aha, I didn’t realize compromising availability was sufficient for the CVE definition of security vulnerability. Projects I’ve worked on have typically excluded availability, though that may not be the norm.
And I see your point about some exploits being highly asymmetric in the attacker’s favor, compared to classic [D]DoS.
The chances of the coin flip yielding heads are roughly 50%, if coins don’t not exist.
Maybe I’m misunderstanding you, but DoS is exactly the same thing as “denial of service”.
My point is that memory leaks can only degrade availability; they are categorically distinct from security vulnerabilities.
I had to look it up to check my memory. Yup! https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2015/06/05/how-gitlab-uses-unicorn-and-unicorn-worker-killer/
I don’t think memory leaks could ever amount to a security vulnerability, but it just feels yucky. I guess I shouldn’t cast stones, I write C++ at work.
Git kinda has it? Have you seen git notes? https://git-scm.com/docs/git-notes
I used to host a Gitlab instance at work. It was dog slow so I started digging into it and discovered they had a serious memory leak in some of their “unicorns,” aka Ruby tasks. Instead of fixing the source of the leak they tacked on a “unicorn killer” that periodically killed tasks. The tasks were supposed to be atomic anyway, so this is technically fine (and maybe a good thing in the long run for correctness a la Netflix’s Chaos Monkey) but I found myself kind of disgusted by the solution. I dropped it and went for a much sparser Git repo web server.
the test environment
The test environment? I don’t miss the web dev world. It’s so nice to be able to run end-to-end tests entirely locally.
Oh dang, sorry about that. I’ve used rclone with great results (slurping content out of Dropbox, Google Drive, etc.), but I never actually tried the Google Photos backend.
You could try using rclone’s Google Photos backend. It’s a command line tool, sort of like rsync but for cloud storage. https://rclone.org/
Ubuntu Linux excretes 20% more performance
The code is speaking to me, but it’s just word salad.