@Ubermeisters May the Swartz be with you.

@Ubermeisters Well, I see someone got up on the chaotic evil side of the bed this morning.

The above isn’t a justification as to why I pirate, but it is the reason why I post things like this.

@ram now you got me thinking about space pirates.

Why looky there - love to see a post get legs… have a boost and an upvote, matey!

Working fine on my end - sounds like ISP filtering or possibly a firewall setting. With an ad blocker to handle popups, you could also try g o k u dot s x - not quite the same server collection, but you might find what you’re looking for.

The first rule about no Github club is that we don’t talk about no Github club

Y’all are beginning to crack me up. You know each time you drop a reply, you’re increasing the exposure of this particular theoretical site right? I didn’t say they had perfect plausible deniability, just an extra layer of it, and whatever action taken against it won’t stop the servers they’re aggregating from, which are accessed by a lot of other apps that do exactly the same thing. Nuking this theoretical aggregator is like plucking a dandelion and thinking you’re done with weeding the lawn - it’s really just not worth the time unless they go after the servers themselves.

Possibly true, but what you’re theoretically looking at isn’t hosting pirated content. It’s a link aggregator that finds an available file to stream to you from servers that already have the full file, which may or may not have been assembled from a legitimate source or torrent. Legally, this gives them a layer of plausible deniability - disclaimer IANAL.

So if this one goes down, as it probably will, someone else will just build another streaming link aggregator that does the exact same thing - there’s more than few out there. This is just basically round 238,592,394,321 of internet whack-a-mole.

For all the Redditors now breathing a sigh of relief, grab a beer, take a load off, and remember, remember, the 5th of November.

Gotcha - makes sense. Hadn’t heard of MPE yet - thanks, I’ll check it out.

Regarding the construction of the algorithm to dictate the tuning through the bass input, this sounds very similar to what arpeggiators do - set the tonic note and the scale type, octaves to travel and melodic direction and you’re good to go. While I had a hard time finding a readily available example of an actual algorithm, here’s a list of free arpeggiator vst plugins that may have developer pages or files you might be able to use as a starting point. I’m thinking that the bass sets the tonic note, reseting the middle C on the melodic keyboard and arranging the subsequent notes in the scale - just like an arpeggiator does, except rather than playing your notes for you, it’s arranging the pitch of your inputs.

But then, I’m not familiar with the stradella bass layout at all, so I may be just talking out my ass. Nonetheless, cool project, and I look forward to seeing it when you’ve got it complete!

Is there a reason why you’re looking at firmware rather than using a USB port to send midi to a DAW?

I love the design, and as someone who’s been using FL Studio for a long time with keyboard controllers, I’d look at developing a midi specification that it or similar software can read. Then you have access to their algorithms for any sort of tone/sound modification you need. If there’s not what you’re looking for in the basic software package, you can look at 3rd party .vst plugins (or write your own).

A fine namesake, passed down through the generations, a mark of greatness none could have foretold, for his would be the seed that gave birth to a dynasty, and in 40054, Lord Syntax, Emperor of the Error, takes arms as Twelfth Commander of the Line against the Googlish heretics and their daemonic servers.

chainsword revs

We will watch your domination of the airwaves with great interest, young old Skysinger.

We will watch your career with great interest, young Skysinger.

Great work, and an excellent tool for those looking to create their own online radio stations.

Direct action link to send statements and call your representatives (US) www.badinternetbills.com

True. OP looked like s/he wanted a simple answer so I just went with the basics, especially as there’s not a noticeable difference in basic browsing performance between the two in their current form (although I think FF is slightly faster right now).

Brave is not your friend - if they’re willing to violate copyright law by secretly scraping websites and then selling the content in their AI, I’m sure they’re willing to sell your data if the price is high enough (if they aren’t already).

Firefox, on the other hand, has been the most trusted browser since dial-up, and is run by a non-profit. It’s an easy choice for me.

Mainly because it’s impossible to tie a solid metric between piracy viewings and marketing impact, or at least it’s difficult to the point where it hasn’t been done yet. You’d need to have a pirate viewership metric tied to movie sales / streaming views and prove a correlation to assign a value that you can present to media executives.

Until that metric relationship is established in dollars and cents, the studios will ignore it, as there’s no proof it’s making them money. You’ll note that recent releases and re-releases (cough Morbius) have spoken to the industry’s ineptitude in reading underground internet trends - there’s no way they’ll ever look at piracy as a profit center unless you can smack them in the face with a large dollar figure.

Notepad ++

Holy shit that’s awesome - bookmarked. Thanks!