I still have people trying to convince me that this would let us run massively complex websites with thousands of users for pennies a month

You can “explain” it that way as much as you want, that doesn’t make it true.

That’s a completely different kind of AI. This story, and all the discussion up to this point, has been about the LLM based AIs being employed by Google search and ChatGPT.

I love how confidently wrong you are!

They have no memory actually. They are completely static. When you chat with them, every single previous prompt and response from that session is fed back through as if it were one large single prompt. They are just faking it behind a chat-like user interface. They most definitely do not learn anything after training is complete.

i like how the answers are the exact same generic unhelpful drivel you hear 20k times a month if you’re depressed as well.

It makes sense though. It was trained on that drivel.

Ohh wow. I just thought this was some new game intro thing. Had no idea it wasn’t supposed to do that.

I am altering the meme. Pray I do not alter it any further.

As a software developer / network admin, all of these are almost always “I fucked up configuring the web server”.

I’ve never been able to get GPU acceleration working in qemu/kvm. That’s also why the “just works” aspect of virtual box is important.

Ohh, she knew.

I guess that depends on what we are using it for. I use it for CAD / CAM software that only works in Windows (Vectric Aspire). Nothing else has been able to give me 3d previews with any kind of usable performance.

Odd, since in my experience, it’s the most consistently reliable, performant, and easy to setup / use desktop vm package I’ve used. It always seems to “just work” when others don’t

I use both features.

Vectric Aspire for my CNC work.

It’s what C++ would look like if it had been designed today.

So, it’s C#?

/s

It’s only happening that many times because you are blocking it, so it thinks it is disconnected and is checking to see if it managed to reconnect.

Ohhhh no, his phone checked to see if it was connected to the Internet! The horrors!

… And your reply shows exactly why no one should take anything you say seriously. You’re just trolling.

As long as you keep relying on this cliche excuse, Linux is never going to be treated as a serious desktop operating system.

Distros are trying to create usable, friendly systems. They failed at that if their distros are this fragile. That’s what “unacceptable” means in this context. You can’t just throw your middle finger up in the air at the user when their system fails by saying “you didn’t pay for it” and scurry off giggling. Yet Linux advocates keep pushing Linux on inexperienced users, saying that it’s the solution to everything; that it’s so easy their grandma uses it.

I don’t use Linux as anything more than a toy for this very reason. I’ll start taking it seriously when its advocates do.