Competition.

I agree, autocracy sucks!

There’s already censorship free versions of stable diffusion available. You can run it on your own computer for free.

How about something autonomous that makes choices of its own will, and performs long term learning that influences the choices it makes, just as a flat benchmark.

LLMs don’t qualify, they’re trained, retain information within a conversation, then forget it after the conversation is closed. They don’t do any long term learning after their initial training so they’re basically forever trapped in the mode of regurgitating within the parameters set by the training data at the time they’re trained.

That’s just a very fancy way to search and read out the training data. Definitely not an active intelligence in there.

They also don’t have any autonomy, they’re not active of their own accord when they’re not being addressed. They’re not sitting there thinking, so they have no internal personal landscape of thought. They have no place in which a private intelligence can be at play.

They’re innert.

“What am I supposed to call LLMs if not calling them AIs?”

…really dude? They’re large language models, not artificial intelligences. So that’s what you call them. Because that’s what they are.

The fact that they came from research into artificial intelligence doesn’t factor in. Microwave ovens came from radar research, doesn’t mean we call them radars, does it?

Oof, programmers calling LLMs “AI” - that’s embarrassing. Glorified text generators don’t need ethics, what’s the risk? Making the Internet’s worst texts available? Who cares.

I’m from an era when the Anarchists Cook Book, and The Unabombers Manifesto were both widely available - and I’m betting they still are.

There’s no obligation to protect people from “dangerous text” - there might be an obligation to allow people access to them though.

I don’t think it would be easier, I think it’s my answer to the question asked. Look at the post again.

It’s nothing personal dude, it’s just someone’s question on the Internet. The question isn’t about whether it would be easy.

Legal waiver (no one under 18) and six picture limit, you can only change your pictures once a week.

So write it to be decentralized, like BitTorrent or limewire, but for dating.

Dating apps.

We need an open source completely free dating app.

No paying for matches, no limits …just they’re in your town, you look at their photos, you can talk, anyone can block anyone.

There’s a multi-part talk on YouTube if you want to hear all about it.

There should be instructions that range from beginner, where every little step is included as well as major details as to why - all the way up to expert, which are just a few sentences.

Really depends on your phone, different models present different levels of difficulties from very easy to literally impossible.

C++ is focused on getting a strong degree of root control over the hardware of lots of systems. Which is part of why it’s difficult.

What else am I missing?

Global Linux usage stats vs global Windows usage stats for PC Desktops.