Yeah, who the hell is out there SSHing into their web server “to update their blog” but needs to be talked down like a toddler to convince them to try out Linux? This is a mythical beast of an user that does not exist.

People that do these sorts of remote work via GUIs exist. But yes, the switch is likely pretty obvious to them. I for one used to do it with Minecraft server stuff, I had FileZilla; Dolphin pretty much replaced that instantly for me. MUCH later, scripts replaced Dolphin.

This is a massive dealbreaker for a whole bunch of people, for understandable reasons.

Is it though? They’d face the same issues switching to MacOS. There’s no point in lying that some of their favorite programs may not work. I still miss Paint.net though GIMP has grown on me a lot.

This is simultaneoulsy an over and understatement. You can very likely access your old Windows drives from Linux, but it’s janky enough that this piece of advice makes sense.

Nobody is going to leave their old Windows files on their OS drive AND install Linux unless their goal is to dual boot (and that’s clearly not who this is for).

The entire file system needs to be replaced in the process of installing Linux, so there’s no “somebody should find a better solution to this.” The only way to do it would be to relocate and resize partitions as files are copied … and that’s incredibly dangerous. Not to mention attempting to guess what files are important to the Windows user has a high probability to fail.

This advice is good. You should regularly copy stuff you care about to an external hard drive and ideally use a backup program anyways. SSDs don’t fail as fast as HDDs did, but it will happen someday (or very well could).

However, every single tutorial and guide you read will tell you to update all right at the top with the compulsive zeal of a puppy who has just smelled a hidden treat.

Yeah, I’ve never liked this as an argument for Linux. People should update software (at least when there’s a security related issue) … for the exact same reason they should ditch Windows 10. However, as you said “Having to explain to people that their perfectly working computer is actually not working despite all available evidence is a bit of an issue.”

Many people prefer to roll the dice with those issues.

Yeah, I think that’s probably for the best honestly.

Ahhh so leapp will simply become less relevant because a better upgrade mechanism will take over

Huh, thanks for the history and I missed that last part so thanks for that too!

It sounds like the original edit program might have been (at least partially) hand coded assembly or something (maybe some unportable C that made a variety of bad assumptions) if they were never able to port it to anything but 32-bit x86.

Maybe the new edit will gain any missing functionality eventually.

Interesting … yeah it looks like Leapp can do some upgrades for Alma and possibly others as well (TIL). I’m not sure how well that upgrade process would compare / be supported vs Debian though.

What’s the image mode and ostree stuff? Is that required for RHEL and/or Alma going forward?

No that’s canonical

There are pros and cons to verbosity and to using many files vs one.

Cron needs a special tool to edit it because you can break a bunch of stuff trying to edit another, very easily, and by accident.

The commands themselves when I was first learning I found easier to remember than things like dmesg or /var/log/ … they all follow similar conventions and aren’t so chopped up short that you can’t guess what they do by looking at them.

Similar to how most people don’t prefer 3 letter variables in code … I’m glad we’ve largely moved on from 3 letter commands. Granted, if you use them a lot you should definitely make your own three letter aliases in your preferred shell scripting language.

I think systemd has moved desktop and server Linux towards being more BSD-like … and I don’t necessarily think that’s a bad thing.

Maybe we’ll end up needing an X11 -> Wayland sort of transition where there are protocols instead of “an implementation.”

However, I’ve yet to see systemd be meaningfully detrimental. Are distros a little less different? Yeah. Has it made my life easier when I need to go between distros? Also, yeah.

I think on some level, we’re just getting to a more mature Linux desktop and server … and as a result consolidating on stuff that really doesn’t have strong reasoning to be different.

TIL; though I moved my servers to Debian … having the ability to sanely upgrade without a reinstall is a major plus.

That’s interesting; I find the git CLI pretty intuitive especially for basic use cases most people would need, but I’ve also used git for 15 years now.

git is genuinely one of the best tools ever created. It is an extremely simple idea with crazy effectiveness and a reasonable UX that is a bit off putting at first but makes a lot of sense later on.

That said, I’d genuinely be curious what you think jj has improved upon git.

It is not; it’s a distinctly British-influenced if not outright British term.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waste_container

Nice find!

Interesting, though I’m not sure that it would really be lemmy at that point, no?

ActivityPub in a certain sense is not Plebbit … and I’m not sure how compatible these ideas really are.

Was there something special about it?

I can’t say that I’d noticed anything … but I’m always happy for fixes!

Your best bet is to take this here https://github.com/ValveSoftware/Proton/issues/8622

I think this is only conditionally true… A good AMD based system on say Fedora with a GPU that’s at least a year old … you really won’t have much of a problem on Linux in my experience or much to fix.

I did not say it’s not semantically well defined.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brainfuck#Hello_World! – this is semantically well defined, but it’s still vague. Vagueness is a property of how well the syntax is conveying intent.

Hm… I’ll admit I wasn’t awkward of the .__len__ function. However, does this mean it’s possible to write a len(x) == 0 that’s diverges from not x?

If not, then the substitution is still valid (and not presumably also considers the same fundamental. If so, that’s kind of silly.

EDIT: I missed the part of your comment about .__bool__ … so yeah in theory you could have something where these two operations are not equivalent.

Arguably, you could just say that’s pathological and invalid. Then, still have an optimized path to prefer not .__bool__() if .__len__() == 0 is the comparison you’d be making. Even with the extra interpreter check during evaluation, that would quite possibly be faster if the overhead is truly high.

EDIT 2: you’d probably need a little bit more overhead than a straight substitution anyways because you need to maintain the semantic of “if this thing is None it’s not valid if the syntax was originally len(x).”