

More the merrier! Start it anyway!


More the merrier! Start it anyway!
On a side note, your installation of Void reminded me of my very first archlinux experience back when ‘archinstall’ wasn’t a thing yet.


most people are going to destroy their home servers running these workloads


is it illegal to write abstraction APIs on top of CUDA? I have heard this argument for half of this decade and i think something that abstracts the CUDA stuff into a thin HAL that can also call other GPU Progamming interfaces would avoid vendor lock-in.
although, I guess the main challenge is the ever-changing surface of the CUDA api?
Edit: Ok so if the argument is we should be able to use NVIDIA GPUs without CUDA that any amount of abstraction is a moot point.


So, the evil is pretending that it’s done out of the goodness of their heart. We all know the end game.


oh is there a controversy with BSD?


the commitment is from open source maintainers who honestly need to see some support and traction. Hopefully the idea that necessity is the mother of all inventions motivates the few who still have 486 chips to contribute support.
Actually I also pronounce it as en-ginks. The parent comment was not obvious to me
that’s how i pronounce it from the very first time i saw it


came to comment the same. But it’s been a while since I was in tiling window land so not sure if it matches what the poster is looking for.


Instructions unclear… Am vampire now.


Case in point*


I think you’re the one who keeps thinking about what your friends recommended. They simply gave you an option and moved on. you on the other hand seem to have devolved into a crusade against an alternative choice in running your own OS.


it is quite terrifying that people think translating from formal constraints in math to informal english is either accurate or deterministic.
And they ask the LLM to not look at requirements but who is guaranteeing it won’t just hallucinate them out of thin air later when messy prompts inevitably trigger a butterfly effect?


So I would like to know from experts working on Realtek or those who are following closely enough to understand the details what exactly does the “Big HAL layer” entail interms of so much refactoring?
From what I can understand it looks like most of the vendor released stuff is not inline to the design of the kernel and thus it works in a different manner than the rest of the kernel.
But then, why wouldn’t experts try to clean room implement the driver by mimicking the official driver?


yeah thanks for the resources. I decided to just go through the manual.
And yeah, the older terms… I understand them as I am a crusty millenial and kind of like the charm of it.
my goal is to shift to emacs for work as I am drawn to the efficient notetaking + planner + dev environment with org mode.


any quick way to learn emacs syntax for a long time vim user? I understand if you suggest evil mode but lets assume i actually want to learn the emacs motions.
I can go through the emacs manual but that is more of a longer term engagement.


join a game company as a junior. Hate every bit of it and then realize you’re better off doing something else.
Or skip all of that and pick something you are somewhat familiar with today.
If you’re still reading that means you want to continue on this treacherous path. Fine, fastest way to start i guess is playtesting but with companies asking customers to do that for them… the role is kind of lacking at the moment.
best you can do in your free time is start with trying out every aspect of game design upto a beginner level: learn basic coding in a specific language like python. learn to make simple text based adventures and fill-in-the-blank puzzles.


nah they no longer care about retail. the real mullah is made in corporate and B2B.
That’s the driver behind every enshittificatiom behavior.
you get free electricity or your PC parts are made of magic? running inference workloads frequently is going to have a significant impact. This is on top of using your PC for other things like gaming and work.