Did they get their people out? Or did they just need time to determine no one was there?

C# is a better language anyway.

I expect the future is in Rust and C#.

I’d rather add more Jira stories.

It’s their philosophy, not mine. I think the Lemmy devs get a meager salary, and I’m perfectly okay with that.

But if you’re gonna stick to no pay, it makes sense to go all the way with it.

Probably not worth the PR hit. There’s at least tens of thousands, if not millions of dollars of development work in Jellyfin. (Sorry my order of magnitude isn’t more precise.) Getting $2500 out of a developer budget may not be worth the accusations of being paid in hardware.

Not that I would complain, but I can see the logic. Imagine donating $200,000 worth of developer time and then being accused of doing it for the money because you got a $2100 laptop out of it.

I do wonder what the $300 was for. It’s gotta be some kind of specific hardware component testing.

This is the biggest reason I don’t own a smartwatch yet. I want to own my own health data, and not have it locked into Fitbit or Google.

You can use both on your phone to sync with each of them, yes. Immich and Google Photos won’t communicate directly (and don’t need to).

It’s a good idea in case your Google account ever gets banned. (Say you issue a chargeback against Google Wallet or something.)

I have a lot of experience with both. As a tech savvy user, I slightly prefer KeePass. Syncing between devices is slightly more painful, but I find it to be more reliable, and it doesn’t have the attack surface that Bitwarden does. (While encrypted, Bitwarden still really wants a web server and a local database connection.)

VaultWarden is probably better for those who can’t be bothered to move a file around and want direct browser integration. With KeePass when you need a password, you’ll make sure the username has focus and then alt+tab to KeePass and hit “autofill”. Some sites won’t take “username{tab}password{enter}” and you’ll have to customize the configuration.

VaultWarden is better at prompting you to add new passwords. I prefer the workflow that’s encouraged by KeePass, where you open the app first and use the app to open the URL. (You can do this in VaultWarden too, but it’s less obvious.)

For images I highly recommend Immich. It’s the Google Photos equivalent, and it works excellently.

I use SyncThing for documents, but photos from my phone go to Immich.

VaultWarden if you want all the features without paying $40/year.

Otherwise Bitwarden will either allow you to self-host OR allow you to share passwords with one other person (using their server), but not both.

VaultWarden just unlocks all the features.

For what? To keep track of who’s drinking coffee? Are you charging for coffee?

Which isn’t a bad idea, but I’d still want some kind of parental controls like Android has to limit screen time. I don’t need Netflix.com to be all or nothing, but I certainly don’t want it to be four hours a day either.

!leagueoflegends@lemmy.world I want more then two others to discuss my hobby.

I don’t agree, but it’s a unique, interesting thought that I can upvote.

It’d also be nice to have the community name in a link to a post or comment, just for general use.

And it can be in any language, but typically comes from someone who started with Java.

Okay, here we go. I’m going to spit out some bullshit and home someone corrects me if I’m wrong. I’ve looked for some explanations and this is what I’ve gotten.

Are you ready?

The Factory Pattern.

My understanding is that the purpose is a function to return any of several types of objects, but a specific type, not just an interface or whatever they might all inherit from.

I think most languages now have something like a “dynamic” keyword to solve this issue by allowing determination of the type only at runtime. (To be used with extreme caution.)

But most of the time I see the Factory pattern, it’s used unnecessarily and can only return one specific type. Why they would use a Factory pattern here and not just a plain old constructor confounds me.

Am I off base?

Seems like he’s worried you’ll Java everything up, which can be valid.

I think a good, easy example is whether your application should allow a selection of databases or be tied to one database.

You can make arguments for either, often (but not always) regardless of your use case.

I don’t know. Doesn’t look nearly as cool as my XP desktop with custom themes did.

I think they wanted something more like $10k/year, which seems pretty cheap when you compare it to the price of one employee.