Kinda depends entirely on the scale we r talking about
Kinda depends entirely on the scale we r talking about
Nah, seems like it was ur instance.
Arch is gonna die the moment u r late to upgrade ur packages, and i don’t really wanna live in constant fear of losing one update and thus my hole system by a kernel panic.
So u can use it if u r one of those guys always on the edge for updates.
Is this real? I tought musk wouldn’t be able to go lower, but, dude LMAO
The only thing im absolutely sure is this it’s going to fuel rage agains this shit in some people, which being honest is what we need.
Im so feed up with us buying something just to not own it, that alegation about being unable to give instruccions to people to download info from their devices (the keys) is absolute bs.
I have always wondered why they use their “real” accounts to participate in this kind of things.
As normal protocol for me and the people i know its required to have everything isolated, so why dont they do the same with something witch even tough is legal, could get u in trouble. Why?
Does someone has the last release files? pls tell me someone has it
Yup, directly to production will be.
Look out for a tutorial to install grub again.
What bad change does windows 11 even make from windows 10?
The primordial one, u need a Microsoft account to even be able to install.
The next, all the ui changes wich prioritizes “looks” over being useable.
All the new extra telemetry, etc, etc, etc.
I mean, that last update gave me an always wonderful kernel panic, so…
Then u need therapy, however u r a programmer so u won’t ever get rid of the voices, sadly C:
How many Hardware supports BSD? That’s what I though.
Its an apple situation, if u only support 10 different devices ur BSD developers can focus all its time to fix 3rd partys shity jobs.
It works, not because Nvidia delivered something functional, or that worked for that matter.
Personally I like this one, its the usual atx tower super compressed to make it a mini tower pc
Valent
I just make a quick search and found about it, looks promising. If u test it out tell us how it worked.
Nah, I just check out and its close source proprietary shenanigans.
First of all, thanks this r news for me. But I don’t think is a good idea to use the swap file in btrfs.
It is supported since kernel 5.0
There are some limitations of the implementation in BTRFS and Linux swap subsystem:
filesystem - must be only single device
filesystem - must have only single data profile
subvolume - cannot be snapshotted if it contains any active swapfiles
swapfile - must be preallocated (i.e. no holes)
swapfile - must be NODATACOW (i.e. also NODATASUM, no compression)
With active swapfiles, the following whole-filesystem operations will skip swapfile extents or may fail:
balance - block groups with extents of any active swapfiles are skipped and reported, the rest will be processed normally
resize grow - unaffected
resize shrink - works as long as the extents of any active swapfiles are outside of the shrunk range
device add - if the new devices do not interfere with any already active swapfiles this operation will work, though no new swapfile can be activated afterwards
device delete - if the device has been added as above, it can be also deleted
device replace - ditto
It depends, for a normal user? Ext4, maybe btrfs because in terms of stability is the best {but u lose some functions like the ability to make a swap file, wich today isn’t really that useful, but u lose the ability to make one). Want something really fast fort large files? ZFS, but if u experience an energy loss it could be really catastrophic.
Ext in general is so good that even to this day android it’s still using EXT2, 2!
I think it was called OnBoard, basiclly a 1:1 keyboard clone on ur screen.