![](/static/253f0d9/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemdro.id/pictrs/image/6d56629c-a7b1-465d-8b58-ad77926e3a41.png)
Apparently it’s coming. It’s been on the way for quite some time, but the chatter I see suggests it is actively being worked on.
Apparently it’s coming. It’s been on the way for quite some time, but the chatter I see suggests it is actively being worked on.
What do you mean? I haven’t followed the development directly, I’ve just been a user and so far things seem to be going pretty well. Curious what shortsightedness you are talking about?
Most welcome :)
No, TPM isn’t involved here. There’s a few kinds of passkeys.
Hardware bound keys are locked up in a physical device like a TPM or a YubiKey. That physical device has its own security to unlock it- TPMs often work with fingerprints, or a YubiKey usually has a PIN (aka password).
A passkey can also be done in software, and that’s what’s happening here. BitWarden stores the encryption key within the BitWarden vault, so it can (eventually) be accessed by any device signed into your BitWarden account. Thus the same passkey works on your computer, laptop, phone, tablet, etc.
It’s worth noting that Google and Apple both do it this way- the passkey is stored in their password manager, and you use Face ID or fingerprint ID to unlock that.
Their service is probably set up so the per-user overhead is low.
Think about it- what does your ‘using it’ actually consume? a few hundred KB of disk space and a little bandwidth?
I agree it’s a great value though. Signed up a few weeks ago and haven’t looked back.
Good bot
(Does anything on Lemmy track that?)