

Most search engine bots publish a list of verified IP addresses where they crawl from, so you could check the IP of a search bot against that to know.
Most search engine bots publish a list of verified IP addresses where they crawl from, so you could check the IP of a search bot against that to know.
Actually I think most search engine bots publish a list of verified IP addresses where they crawl from, so you could check the IP of a search bot against that to know.
I’ve, once again, noticed Amazon and Anthropic absolutely hammering my Lemmy instance to the point of the lemmy-ui container crashing.
I’m just curious, how did you notice this in the first place? What are you monitoring to know and how do you present that information?
People have a psychological bias to humanize anything that communicates with them and companies are trying to latch onto that mechanism because they benefit when people get an emotional attachment to websites. So I think Google and many others are trying to make people think of websites as things with agencies, rather than machines controlled by people. And yea I think they are partly successful.
Not dissimilar to how LLM AI is marketed nowadays.
My mom asked me the other day whether a virus warning was a scam or not. It was a webpage in her browser. She did not understand that it was not her computer system warning her, but just the website itself. People can’t even tell the difference between their operating system and their apps.
I think you vastly overestimate the technical proficiency of the average user. The average user does not understand technology and computers at all. The average user can barely send an email.
Wow, I did not know that still runs in 32 bit. Damn, Valve should really get on that 😅
Does it affect you somehow? I don’t know anyone still running 32-bit systems.
I think I read somewhere that part of the motivation is that they won’t need a runtime to be installed to use it, but Go could fill that role as well of course.
But I think you said it yourself:
I know this is blasphemy, but why not Go? Why Rust? I love writing Rust CLIs
I guess they also prefer Rust to Go. I’d choose Rust over go for a CLI any day. Why do you say Rust wouldn’t be good in an “industrial setting”? I use Rust professionally and I don’t see any problems in that setting.
Long but a very good blog post. I largely agree with all the conclusions and similarly wish Rust would go in a better direction with regards to certain features, especially compile-time reflection.
I also sadly agree with the comments on the Rust leadership. My personal experience with contributing to Rust has not been great, though I haven’t tried very hard (but exactly because the initial feeling was not great).
I’d recommend switching away from Rocket if you can. It is not very actively maintained and Axum has become the better choice.
A pi with multiple terabytes of storage?
We’ve got a male and female form for pretty much all jobs
You mean like gendered versions of the words for jobs? Or what do you mean?
no global admins, and no way shut down communities-meaning true censorship resistance.
“True censorship resistance” is not a desirable property. No normal user wants to deal with moderation. You need to have a structure for delegating moderation and such tasks to other people.
Yes, Lemmy is dominated by people with a certain propensity towards tech. You can’t use Lemmy users as a gauge for what is good UX I would say.
I couldn’t agree more and I see it everywhere as well. It’s systemic.
Which would you choose based on their website?
Problem is, people on Lemmy are techies who might actually prefer the Gimp site. But any “normal” person would not.
Not sure about that one but the following one:
In each language, the words for yes and no never change, regardless of which question they are answering.
This happens in Danish actually. Example:
Kan du lide is? (Do you like ice cream?)
Ja
Kan du ikke lide is? (Do you not like ice cream?)
Jo
So in Danish we have “ja” which means “yes” but “jo” is used instead when answering a negative question, so as to confirm what the negative question asked. This is kind of annoying in English cause if you ask “Do you not like ice cream?” then if you say “yes” does that mean “yes I like ice cream” or does it mean “yes I do not like ice cream”? That’s what “jo” disambiguates.
It’s definitely not a problem in my own projects, but at work is a different story. With a huge project, compile times becomes a real slog.
Definitely useful and I think it compares pretty well to other tooling? My two biggest issues are compile times and “amnesia”. First of all, compile times because the feedback cycle can get really bad. But that’s not really rust-analyzer’s fault, that’s cargo/rustc.
But rust-analyzer also has this weird “amnesia”. Like if I have ran the checks and everything is good, I can go to definition and it will instantly bring me there. But if I make a small change and it starts running cargo check
, it’s like it forgets everything until it’s done with cargo check
. I wish it still allowed me to use what it knew before and go to definitions and give suggestions and such.
dozens of GB of disk use by Rust
I was well above 100GB the other day 😅. But I think there’s a problem with the setup as well
Also your avatar and the image posted here (not the thumbnail) seem broken - I wonder if that’s due to Anubis?