It was recommended until they changed their business model to charging advertisers to be allowed through the blocking because they were “the good type of advert”
You sound like you’ve just made up an unrelated example to dog whistle
Piracy doesn’t deprive anyone of goods.
Piracy should be used whenever you don’t want to pay for something
Shit man, imagine if LTT lost a few dollars
Why? Is floatplane free? Or just really bad.
I’m not agreeing with it, but if I had $100k in my back pocket I would know how I got it. Like I said, the article should have focused on normal people with reasonable and understandable amounts, who probably wouldn’t be able to afford the court costs either.
deleted by creator
This was a good article, US centric, but interesting. Would have been better if it didn’t start with a picture of a happy looking dog and a seizure of $100k cash which the author can’t even explain. The law says you have to prove you didn’t get the money illegally, if I had $100k in my suitcase I think I would be able to explain how I got it.
tax bad
cops bad
corrupt military dictatorships good
Please post details of the tracker :)
Ok thanks
I can support Marxism without supporting Stalin or Mao though
Please tell?
I’d just noticed something similar to this myself, a user banned for saying something about “Russian Trolls” and another banned for saying “I hope so. All the russian and chinese apologists on here make me mad.”
This feels quite extreme and I am wondering “will commenting on this get me banned”
LTT is not a small platform. Let him suck it up.
Spotify and YouTube cost a lot to run, do you block ads or pay for premium?