I was forced to learn some of it at work (using and signing medical payment transactions, with x509 certificates) so I have ar least a starting point. I have no idea how the revoke process works though, I can’t figure out a way that it functions without a central authority getting queried regularly. I thonk I can start without that knowledge though.

Anyway, with your information I’m up and running, thank you again!

“Derived certificates” not child certs, noted !

Yeah why is it always coders that are supposed to be replaced and not a whole slew of other jobs where a wrong colon won’t break the whole system?

Like management or C-Suits. Fuck I’d take chatgpt as a manager any day.

Thank you! This is actually precisely what I need, you IT guys are the best!

I already did but my browser choked on it.

So yes I should probably set up the whole CA thing.

Thank you!

Is there some simple soft that let you make those certs, like with a root cert and then “derived” certs? On linux :-) ?

I guess people have to re-trust every now and then because certs get old, or do they trust the (public partof the) root cert and the daughter certs derived from root are churned out regularly for the sites?

But you have to manually accept this dangerous cert in the browser right?

Very interesting actually, do you have any experience about it or other pointers? I might just set one up myself for my tenfingers sharing protocol…

And you still can’t self certify.

It’s cute the big players are so concerned with my little security of my little home server.

Or is there a bigger plan behind all this? Like pay more often, lock in to government controlled certs (already done I guess because they control DNS and you must have a “real” website name to get a free cert)?

I feel it’s 50% security 50% bullshit.

Edit: thank you all I will dive down the CA certification rabbit hole now! Have worked in C++ & X509 on the client side so maybe I’ll be able to figure it out.

Puts the full EU regulations in robot.txt

That makes it for one of those “rare production bugs” 😁

A raw memory pointer.

The architect sending a pointer over an API, in hexadecimal string format. char *c = “71E4F33B” just cast it on the right structure bro.

Just to add, we only did C/C++, on windows mfc, in a monolithic software.

I spent quite some time assuring myself that I was not the insane person before bringing it up with him.

I’m on, but no one is interested.

Security issues aside, you can freeze python code to an executable, linux, mac, windows.

Kind of neat IMO. Except the security concerns ofc.

The main parts are the dependency of your files ofc, if they all depends on file A, then that A has to be compiled first, mono tread. Secondly depending on your project (is it lots of dlls or one biig executable) the linker might be a big choke point, as it’s kind of mono threaded (per project).

CCache can be fantastic, I worked on a 700-project soft (one executable), almost 2GB cpp source code, full recompile took around 2h on a modern 10/20 CPU, just compiling was often a drag but with cache it shrank compile times way more than any multiprocessing could.

If you’re several working on a big project you can share the build cache too, so your rebuild will be almost instant because your co-workers have already compiled everything except your changes.

Blaze to the rescue again!

Thank you I’m an idiot.

Will try, thanks!

Edit: where do I find it?

I’d love getting all posts from some low output communities.

???

So what’s the problem with those protocols?

Can’t have Rust on Linux? Just do it in C/C++!

Interesting. I don’t know if older chips are less sensible to EM, I’d bet the reverse, so maybe one day this dusk os can run on an ESP-32! Netstack & USB integrated and lots of useful pins!