• 2 Posts
  • 33 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: May 31st, 2023

help-circle
  • I have limited my usecases for selfhosting and thrown money at the problem. The usecases are:

    • image hosting and sharing with the family
    • backups of our family computers
    • digital file hosting
    • media hosting

    The last one is expendable. The first three are backed up into the cloud. I use a Synology, thus throwing money at the problem. Their cloud backup just works.

    Edit: use cases I do not self host are a mail server for example. The stress outweighs the 12€/year I pay for the service.






  • WhiteHotaru@feddit.detoLinux@lemmy.mlBeginner Linux Guides
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    +1 for Linux Mint for the power user. They will fell familiar and can start their journey from there. The most important concept I would explain would be package managers and flat pack, as in vanilla Windows there is no such thing.

    The second one would be regular updates and that you have to do a little maintenance from time to time

    Mint would be my recommendation for the noob as well. It is a clean distro and does not require a lot of maintenance except regular updates.







  • Hi! I was in your situation in January. I went for a used two bay Synology 720+ model, that came with 10GB RAM and a used WD Red 4 TB WD40EFRX.

    The main reason I switched to a NAS was an easy way to share our children’s photos with my SO. Synology is perfect for this, because the photos app has face recognition and can search through location data, which is coming in handy with 25K photos.

    Second thing I wanted to do on the NAS was the whole backup strategy of our laptops. At the moment we rely on cloud backups, but I wanted to change this to a solid 3-2-1 strategy. On top the cloud backup never really worked on my SOs laptop.

    I had no ambition with selfhosting, but am familiar with Linux. At the moment I have a paperless instance and jellyfish running. I plan to put some shows for the kids on it, my CD collection and am ripping my DVDs.

    Until now the process was very smooth. Paperless has some minor hiccups I could iron out, but the whole Synology infrastructure is really solid.

    I picked the 720+ because the perks of a 723+ seemed negligible to me. This page offers a good comparison: https://nascompares.com/guide/synology-ds720-vs-ds723-nas-which-should-you-choose/



  • I am currently reviving an T410 for my kids. I put an 250 GB SSD inside and the newest Linux Mint and play around with it now. I am still on 4 GB Ram, as I didn’t want to spend the 60€ to upgrade to 8 GB, yet.

    It runs great. I can watch YouTube, browse the web and rip some of my CDs for my NAS and my Kids Audio Players with that sweet internal DVD drive. My guess is 60% of the people would not need more computing power. And this machine was released in 2010.





  • I made this recently because I want to get rid of my work MacBook Air M2 dependence and looked or something comparable.

    Basically, with the Tuxedo you have a little more options regarding the graphics. You can add an RTX 4070 instead of the 4060 and the panel has a 240 Hz refresh rate. If you intend to do some gaming or need more GPU power, this may make a difference. On the other hand, if you need more battery time, a slower refresh rate might be favorable. The Tuxedo one is a little bit dimmer as well (350 nits versus 400 nits).

    Tuxedo control center might be another thing to consider. According to the reviews I looked at, it works really well and Tuxedo offers proper hardware support for their system, having their own people to contribute to the code base and fix things.

    I think the 16" are pretty on par between the two manufacturers. You can find more considerable differences in the 14" models, where Tuxedo offers a dedicated graphics card and Slimbook doesn’t.