• 1 Post
  • 37 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 2nd, 2023

help-circle


  • i’m not really sure what IQ has to do with this. it was originally designed to measure people’s proficiency in school. it was not designed to be a general measure of intelligence. that was something that was co opted by eugenicists.

    here’s a quote from Simon Bidet, the original creator of the IQ test, about his thoughts on the eugenicists using his test:

    Finally, when Binet did become aware of the “foreign ideas being grafted on his instrument” he condemned those who with ‘brutal pessimism’ and ‘deplorable verdicts’ were promoting the concept of intelligence as a single, unitary construct.

    you can read more about this stuff on his wikipedia page. (the quote is from wikipedia)

    even to this day, there is quite a bit of doubt as to how accurately IQ measures “general intelligence”




  • if you’re trying to be malicious, wouldn’t it be better to multiply by Rand() instead of divide by Rand()?

    assuming there are a decent number of recorded sales, you’d end up seeing many of the calls to Rand() returning values very close to 0. so, if you’re dividing by those values, you’d end see lots of sales records reporting values in the thousands, millions, or even billions of dollars. i feel like that screams “software bug” more than anything. on the other hand, seeing lots of values multiplied by values close to 0 would certainly look weird, but it wouldn’t be as immediately suspicious.

    (of course a better thing would just be to use Rand() on a range other than [0,1])