But was $application.old_final the one to rollback to, or $application.old-final2?!
Anony Moose
I love this wild west phase of the Fediverse! Feels like the good ole days of the Internet. Onwards!
- 1 Post
- 57 Comments
Sure, grandpa/grandma, time for your medicine.
Not to mention the benefits of versioning and being able to rollback! There’s something so satisfying about a well set-up CI/CD pipeline.
Anony Moose@lemmy.cato Programming.dev Meta@programming.dev•Introducing Link - A new bot for community suggestionsEnglish3·2 years agoGreat idea :)
Anony Moose@lemmy.cato Announcements@lemmy.ml•Join-Lemmy.org Redesign and Funding DriveEnglish3·2 years agoYou’re tripping, I’ve donated :)
Anony Moose@lemmy.cato Linux@lemmy.ml•ONLYOFFICE 7.5 Released with New PDF Editor + MoreEnglish1·2 years agoNeat, the customization does help make it look a lot better than the defaults. I wonder why they didn’t just make this the new UI.
Anony Moose@lemmy.cato Linux@lemmy.ml•ONLYOFFICE 7.5 Released with New PDF Editor + MoreEnglish3·2 years agoI did not know that, I’ll check out the other options, thanks!
Anony Moose@lemmy.cato Linux@lemmy.ml•ONLYOFFICE 7.5 Released with New PDF Editor + MoreEnglish8·2 years agoOops, yeah, I did!
Anony Moose@lemmy.cato Linux@lemmy.ml•ONLYOFFICE 7.5 Released with New PDF Editor + MoreEnglish301·2 years agoI’ve been using LibreOffice as an MS Office replacement for a decade or so, although most of my documents are still on Google docs. The LibreOffice UI seems to have never really improved at all, and even the updating experience is annoying. I don’t understand how such a lucrative productivity app has no developer support behind it?
OpenOffice got me really excited, because that UI seems modern and polished. It’s really unfortunate that it’s mostly we lb based and apparently really slow.
So yeah, 100% agree with you. LibreOffice with the OpenOffice UI would be 🔥
Oh shit, I remember watching Gumbo Slice backyard street fights back in the day. Didn’t realize this was meant to be him!
Funnily enough, I block very liberally.
I find that having the option to block by keywords, instances, communities and users let’s me curate my feed exactly as I want. What I wouldn’t want is for the blocks to be too broad of a brush (like in the users of instances example), which would lead to missing out on valuable conversations.
Strongly disagree. I want to block certain instances from my feed to remove posts I’m not interested in (eg NSFW, repost bots), but I have nothing against the users.
If users are blocked too, please add that behind a setting toggle.
Anony Moose@lemmy.cato Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.com•Private Tracker Core Memories UnlockedEnglish4·2 years agoOh yeah, that’s the one! It’s a very powerful scene. Crazy that it came out in 2011, a lot of it seemed so prescient. I watched it soon after the pandemic started, I think Netflix featured it around that time for obvious reasons.
Anony Moose@lemmy.cato Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.com•Private Tracker Core Memories UnlockedEnglish4·2 years agoThis scene feels really familiar, which movie is it from?
I don’t have any particular complaints about the speed of Lemmy development or which features the devs are prioritizing or shutting down. Since there are two primary devs who are working on a pretty complex Rust codebase, it is going to take time for new contributors to understand it inside out as well as they do. The philosophy of a codebase is also very important for maintainers to guard, as just adding code or features without an overarching vision can lead to chaos.
Having said that, I’m strongly in favour of multiple forks of the Lemmy backend bring developed. This allows new features, visions, optimizations, etc to be developed quickly and a lot of diverse opinions and philosophies to be entertained, exactly as we’re seeing with instances. Alternative UIs are another example of the benefits of this approach.
This also allows Lemmy maintainers to see which changes are beneficial, and merge them back into the main codebase much more easily. For example, if a fork has 10x the performance with half the resource usage, it’ll be an easy sell to merge back in.
Edit: typo
Edit 2: shutting down, not shitting down 🤦
Anony Moose@lemmy.cato Lemmy@lemmy.ml•That feeling when you're googling the answer to some technical question, and your own Lemmy post appears 4 results down.English16·2 years agolol, I searched for this post title 😛
Anony Moose@lemmy.cato Lemmy@lemmy.ml•That feeling when you're googling the answer to some technical question, and your own Lemmy post appears 4 results down.English12·2 years agoThat’s huge! Makes me realize that there’s not really a way for anybody to know that a particular result is from Lemmy/the fediverse by looking at it, especially with the weird TLDs people use. I wonder if Google will eventually start recognizing ActivityPub clients differently?
Agreed. Terminal is the shite. Makes working in WSL Ubuntu really rewarding.
You monster