Husband, father, kabab lover, history buff, chess fan and software engineer. Believes creating software must resemble art: intuitive creation and joyful discovery.
Views are my own.
Good question!
IMO a good way to help a FOSS maintainer is to actually use the software (esp pre-release) and report bugs instead of working around them. Besides helping the project quality, I’d find it very heart-warming to receive feedback from users; it means people out there are actually not only using the software but care enough for it to take their time, report bugs and test patches.
“Announcment”
It used to be quite common on mailing lists to categorise/tag threads by using subject prefixes such as “ANN”, “HELP”, “BUG” and “RESOLVED”.
It’s just an old habit but I feel my messages/posts lack some clarity if I don’t do it 😅
I didn’t like the capitalised names so configured xdg to use all lowercase letters. That’s why ~/opt
fits in pretty nicely.
You’ve got a point re ~/.local/opt
but I personally like the idea of having the important bits right in my home dir. Here’s my layout (which I’m quite used to now after all these years):
$ ls ~
bin
desktop
doc
downloads
mnt
music
opt
pictures
public
src
templates
tmp
videos
workspace
where
bin
is just a bunch of symlinks to frequently used apps from opt
src
is where i keep clones of repos (but I don’t do work in src
)workspace
is a where I do my work on git worktrees (based off src
)Thanks! So much for my reading skills/attention span 😂
Which Debian version is it based on?
Something that I’ll definitely keep an eye on. Thanks for sharing!
RE Go: Others have already mentioned the right way, thought I’d personally prefer ~/opt/go
over what was suggested.
RE Perl: To instruct Perl to install to another directory, for example to ~/opt/perl5
, put the following lines somewhere in your bash init files.
export PERL5LIB="$HOME/opt/perl5/lib/perl5${PERL5LIB:+:${PERL5LIB}}"
export PERL_LOCAL_LIB_ROOT="$HOME/opt/perl5${PERL_LOCAL_LIB_ROOT:+:${PERL_LOCAL_LIB_ROOT}}"
export PERL_MB_OPT="--install_base \"$HOME/opt/perl5\""
export PERL_MM_OPT="INSTALL_BASE=$HOME/opt/perl5"
export PATH="$HOME/opt/perl5/bin${PATH:+:${PATH}}"
Though you need to re-install the Perl packages you had previously installed.
First off, I was ready to close the tab at the slightest suggestion of using Velocity as a metric. That didn’t happen 🙂
I like the idea that metrics should be contained and sustainable. Though I don’t agree w/ the suggested metrics.
In general, it seems they are all designed around the process and not the product. In particular, there’s no mention of the “value unlocked” in each sprint: it’s an important one for an Agile team as it holds Product accountable to understanding of what is the $$$ value of the team’s effort.
The suggested set, to my mind, is formed around the idea of a feature factory line and its efficiency (assuming it is measurable.) It leaves out the “meaning” of what the team achieve w/ that efficiency.
My 2 cents.
Good read nonetheless 👍 Got me thinking about this intriguing topic after a few years.
This is fantastic! 👏
I use Perl one-liners for record and text processing a lot and this will be definitely something I will keep coming back to - I’ve already learned a trick from “Context Matching” (9) 🙂
That was my case until I discovered that GNU tar has got a pretty decent online manual - it’s way better written than the manpage. I rarely forget the options nowadays even though I dont’ use tar
that frequently.
TBH I use whatever build tool is the better fit for the job, be it Gradle, SBT or Rebar.
But for some (presumably subjective) reason, I like GNU Make quite a lot. And whenever I get the chance I use it - esp since it’s somehow ubiquitous nowadays w/ all the Linux containers/VMs everywhere and Homebrew on Mac machines.
I just love the “Block User” feature. Immediate results w/ zero intervention by the mods 😆
Nice! Good to see this idea becoming more common 👍
I personally use Firefox Relay which gives me better control for my workflow - I usually need my temporary e-mails to last a bit longer, eg a week or a month.
On another note, the post clickable URL opens the Lemmy instace landing page and not that of the disposable email service.
A bit too long for my brain but nonetheless it written in plain English, conveys the message very clearly and is definitely a very good read. Thanks for sharing.
That single line of Lisp is probably (defmacro generate-compiler (...) ...)
which GCC folks call every time they decide to implement a new compiler 😆
Would be lovely to have a download per release diagram along w/ the release date (b/c Summer matters in the FOSS world 😆)
When i read the title, my immediate thought was “Mojolicious project renamed? To a name w/ an emoji!?” 😂
We plan to open-source Mojo progressively over time
Yea, right! I can’t believe that there are people who prefer to work on/with a closed source programming language in 2023 (as if it’s the 80’s.)
… can move faster than a community effort, so we will continue to incubate it within Modular until it’s more complete.
Apparently it was “complete” enough to ask the same “community” for feedback.
I genuinely wonder how they managed to convince enthusiasts to give them free feedback/testing (on github/discord) for something they didn’t have access to the source code.
PS: I didn’t downvote. I simply got upset to see this happening in 2023.
I articulated my thoughts on the topic in a separate post: [DISCUSS] Website to monitor Lemmy servers’ performance/availability
Please share your thoughts/feedback over there.
UPDATE: lemmy.ml is now on lemmy-meter 🥳