Does tripple buffering make a noticeable difference for desktop animations? The overview feels pretty choppy for me on 6.0 at 144hz.
Does tripple buffering make a noticeable difference for desktop animations? The overview feels pretty choppy for me on 6.0 at 144hz.
Update: Renaming ‘Firewall’ to ‘Z-Firewall’ via the KDE Menu Editor has put Firewall below Firefox, and I’m using that as a workaround.
It’s pretty odd, since Firewall should already be below Firefox alphabetically. But there you go!
edit: ‘.Firewall’ works as well.
It’s in my panel, sure. But sometimes I launch things from the menu too. It depends on what’s natural in the moment.
I feel like it can’t be usage, because I launch Firefox all the time. Unless it’s something weird like launching the firewall daemon on system startup counting towards KRunner’s statistic…? I just don’t know what factors go into deciding that order.
The configurator is called firewall-config, but it’s configuring a daemon called firewalld. It think it’s from Redhat. Comes standard with Fedora and OpenSuse, among others.
Maybe the ordering of ‘favorite’ plugins is what you’re talking about? If moving those up or down prioritizes krunner results, it unfortunately won’t fix this, as both Firewall and Firefox are sorted under applications. It’s a step in the right direction though.
Where do you change that? I can’t find it in application launcher settings/plasma search settings
It’s already way below Firefox, so I don’t think that changes search order. I’ll probably end up removing it if there’s no other way. Far form ideal, though.
Yes, do you know what the setting is called?
If AMD wasn’t already cheering to Valve, they have to be at this point
Because of the fedora-wearing neckbeard stereotype.
Plasma has been more efficient than XFCE for over three years now.
I don’t know which is technically snappier, but ram not being used does not equal snappier performance.
What does ‘user device access’ mean?