dactylotheca
Sarcastic bitch with a wine problem
- 3 Posts
- 29 Comments
dactylotheca@suppo.fiOPto Programmer Humor@programming.dev•A QA engineer walks into a barEnglish28·11 months agoSome plans less so than others.
Also, I like this framing of users as the enemy. Matches my experience, really.
dactylotheca@suppo.fiOPto Programmer Humor@programming.dev•A QA engineer walks into a barEnglish7·11 months agoWasn’t expecting a fucking rainforest
dactylotheca@suppo.fiOPto Programmer Humor@programming.dev•A QA engineer walks into a barEnglish23·11 months agoOrders a
dactylotheca@suppo.fito Programmer Humor@programming.dev•Came back to learn you have job securityEnglish2·1 year agoIt just irritates the fuck out of me when people write an obvious swear word but either omit letters or “censor” them with eg. *, like that somehow makes it not swearing even though EVERYBODY KNOWS WHAT THAT FUCKING WORD IS.
Either don’t swear if you think it’s so bad, or just write the naughty words out instead of pretending “f*ck” isn’t a bad evil naughty word because you hid one letter like a fucking mentally deficient child.
FUCK.
dactylotheca@suppo.fito Programmer Humor@programming.dev•Give your JS codebase what it deserves!English384·1 year agoJavascript bad.
Applause please.
dactylotheca@suppo.fito Linux@programming.dev•CrowdStrike broke Debian and Rocky Linux months ago, but no one noticedEnglish14·1 year agowhich is something they care deeply about.
They care about quarterly profits. Preventing fuckups of this scale requires long-term effort which is not profitable by itself, it only prevents possible future fuckups, and this is why proper QC etc. aren’t done. Short term profits over everything else.
dactylotheca@suppo.fito Linux@programming.dev•CrowdStrike broke Debian and Rocky Linux months ago, but no one noticedEnglish17·1 year agoWell, if the executive leech class wants workers to have bossware, there’s not all that much people can do about it. Can’t just decide to not use it if your employer demands it
dactylotheca@suppo.fito Programming@programming.dev•Did #julialang end up kinda stalling or at least plateau-ing lower than hoped?English5·1 year ago💫 the magic of the Fediverse ✨
Doctor of Computer Science
stringly-typed
"100%"
yeah that tracks.
dactylotheca@suppo.fito Programmer Humor@programming.dev•Why spend money on ChatGPT?English71·1 year agoOh I’m barely a Julia programmer 😅 I learned it a couple of years ago just to check it out, started writing a personal project with it but got a bit irritated with how interfaces are defined informally and you have to dig through documentation to find out the methods you need to implement, and then just sort of drifted away. Will definitely use it in the future for eg. some signal analysis thingamajigs and so on though, it was a fun language to use with notebooks.
I usually prefer type systems that make me beg for mercy, heh.
dactylotheca@suppo.fito Programmer Humor@programming.dev•Why spend money on ChatGPT?English422·1 year agoOh yeah definitely; a lot of the AI crap out there hasn’t gotten rolled out to the EU yet – some of it because of the GDPR, thank fuck for that.
dactylotheca@suppo.fito Programmer Humor@programming.dev•Why spend money on ChatGPT?English191·1 year agoI’d practically guarantee there’s a nonzero amount of suits out there who think it’d be a fantastic idea, and have at the very least tried to make it happen, and that it’s only a matter of time before one of them talks somebody into it if they haven’t already
dactylotheca@suppo.fito Programmer Humor@programming.dev•Why spend money on ChatGPT?English501·1 year agoNaturally I had to try this, and I’m a bit disappointed it didn’t work for me.
I can’t make that “Looking for specific info?” input do anything unexpected, the output I get looks like this:
Oh yeah, extensions which make them non-regular definitely can make it possible, but just because it’s now somewhat possible with some regex engines doesn’t mean it’s a good idea
Oh yeah they definitely have uses, but there’s a real tendency for people to go a bit crazy with them. Complex regexen aren’t exactly readable, there’s all kinds of fun performance gotchas, there’s sometimes other tools/algorithms that are more suitable for the task, and sometimes people try to use them to eg. parse HTML because they don’t know that it is literally impossible to use regular expressions to parse languages that aren’t regular
Some people, when confronted with a problem, think “I know, I’ll use regular expressions.” Now they have two problems.
dactylotheca@suppo.fito Programmer Humor@lemmy.ml•Yup that's how I got depressedEnglish451·1 year agoI think that’s just IT jobs in general. I noped out after 15 years, no fucking clue what I’ll do but I can tell you it’ll be anything but IT
Right, I must be “very young” if I don’t think that hurling abuse at others is OK.
Yeah, pretty much figured you were one of the people who thought his behavior wasn’t only acceptable but preferable. In other words, an asshole.
The Usenet post I linked to claims it’s originally from the 1st quarter of 1990, but who knows if that’s accurate or not. I actually can’t find a good source for whether Stumpf is the original author or just the one who posted it to rec.humor.funny.reruns, but it’s usually attributed to him at any rate.
But yeah, fairly ancient by internet standards. I remember first running into it in the 90’s