Why? It’s free if you don’t setup a custom runner and those cover your areas.

🤦

Sure, bud. Read up the chain.

At what point do imagine that DHCP is not in play here?

Y’all keep talking about randomized MAC like it’s a tool of anonymity or something. Wow.

It’s a Boolean setting on Android, and there is no reason to change this. OP doesn’t understand networking.

Because the MAC address isn’t a part of the tcp/ip exchange. You’re specifically addressing TCP/IP only.

If you’re trying to block something by MAC address, you’re doing it wrong.

Why the name change though? Most projects put up a deprecation notice on the old one and a link to the new if they do this.

Okay then if Wireguard, you need to punch through your NAT and allow that port access to the world, then to fix your outing issue, you need to look up split-tunneling. That should solve the issues you’re seeing if I’m reading this right.

Well you’ve definitely overcomplicated things by introducing a lot of different variables into the mix. What you’ve set up is a hat on a hat. An abstraction on top of another abstraction.

Let me break it down and just ask: are you just trying to ensure your friends can only access certain addresses on your network, and you’re using Tailscale ACLs for that purpose? It sounds like you just want proper routing security at the edge of your network and are going this route to avoid having to do that maybe?

Tailscale has a place and works great for lots of things, but using it like this is going to cause all kinds of problems eventually. You’re basically just advertising a bunch of confused routes to the coordinator like this, and DERP connections will eventually fail or freak out because you’re providing multiple paths to different things if I’m reading this right. You’re also introducing A LOT of network overhead because of this, and I can forsee a lot of connectivity issues in gaming throughput if that’s the main purpose.

Here you go: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/HiDPI#GNOME

As far as per-app settings, I’m unsure if that’s a thing still, but you can probably dig deeper from here.

Need more info about your DE, GPU, and OS.

Edit: pretty sure unless you’ve forced it, you can’t use fractional scaling here. Use whole integers, so try 2 instead of 1.5

It really depends on what you intend to develop in, but I can say containers aren’t the way to go whatsoever.

Every gaming SDK or IDE I’m aware of has their own version of sandboxed environments. You just start a project, clone it, then let their package management tooling do the rest.

Maybe if you explain a bit more about your approach you could get more constructive answers.

As someone who works with multiple projects who have had to beg and plead to get broken packages taken down, I can confidently assert that it is.

They’ve gotten too popular too fast, and dozens of projects have had similar experiences to OBS.

Some issues we’ve dealth with in the past year:

• unmaintained community package which included libraries that made our package vulnerable and was tripping up static scanners
• one package unpublished due to a complaint from a completely unrelated person
• spammed and suspect versions of our packages being published with shady blobs that aren’t part of our project

There’s plenty more. There just isn’t any kind of moderation, and there needs to be. Regardless of their original intent, it’s now become too big to just let go. Similar things have happened over the years with almost every maintained public package repository: gems, npm, pypi…etc.

Now it’s time for the Flathub folks to step up and do some moderation to prevent worse things from happening. The minimum they could do is add a flag for official packages that are confirmed to be from the proper sources, but that requires a bit of effort on their part.

There’s a ton, but I still don’t find them very useful. The real thing I find dumb is the hardware acceleration for 95% of use-cases. Unless you’re just sitting and watching scrolling output, I don’t see the need to sacrifice efficiency for faster rendering, and even then, I can’t say I’ve had many issues with standard terms either.

Ghostty is the one getting the most hype recently, and it’s alright. It feels more put together than Kitty or Alacritty. Rio is mostly a toy with a bunch of goofy visual effects. Honestly can’t say any of them have features that improve my workflow over just having a bunch of named windows all over the place though.

Separate your services if possible. NAS just needs to store files. Eggs in one basket, fault tolerance yada yada.

This, plus also it’s good to revisit your setups from time to time to audit and improve.

I’m sorry, but you’ve completely missed either the point, or how it works.

Flathub is really the problem here for not properly verifying package owners/maintainers and allowing them to moderate other versions of their work.

There honestly just needs to finally be a way to sort official packages from community packages. Right now it’s a mess. Fedora should just take theirs down.

Lol. I’m not asking if it is. I’m saying it has absolutely no impact on the stability of a system at all. You’re also confusing stability and reliability, so there’s that.

If OP isn’t handing out root passwords, no standard user is going to be able to affect a normal mutable system either.

Y’all a bunch of hypequeens 😂

Atomic has nothing to do with stability. Really wish these kids who have no idea about it would stop with that noise.

They’re all pretty much the same now as far as distributions go. Kernel and driver versions paired with whatever versions of wine/proton are what will get you better performance now.

If you want to stay more towards the bleeding edge of things, go with a faster releasing rolling distro. Fedora or Arch, but the former unless you’re really familiar with what you’re doing.

Cachy - you might have some extra hoops to jump through. The performance difference is negligible for just desktop usage.

PopOS - no real benefit unless you’re running Nvidia, and then it’s only for the moderately useful graphics switching stuff.

You sound like you want Fedora for simplicity’s sake, honestly. There’s really no other major performance differences between desktop distros. Any tunings that one has you can just apply to another if you know their benefits.

Doesn’t matter what DE it is.