B.S. Biology; M.S. in Bioinformatics. ❤️ tech, FOSS, Lana Del Rey, Linux, Fedora, KDE, but also ARM MacBooks & iOS.
Good @ Python, forced to use R, learning Rust.
🎮 Prey (2017), Bioshock, Portal & Dead Space.
Bi, more into guys atm.
@hyfi:matrix.org
also ndr@beehaw.org
Two things are at play here:
Out of all the recommendations and ads, you only notice those who are actually relevant, so you’re biased.
One would be surprised by how easy it is to predict interests and patterns based on very little information; there’s no need to spy all private conversations for that.
Was this accidentally posted on Lemmy from Mastodon because the community was tagged?
AFAIK their free tier doesn’t do P2P.
I really like the concept but I never managed to convince anyone in real life to use it with me. lmao
Edit: I’ve just realized this post is from 7 months ago; why did someone bump this now?
You could try on Library Genesis or Z-Library, but if you can’t find it there, then I don’t know, sorry.
Edit: wait, I misread. If you’re looking for printed books, I don’t think this is the right community.
Same can be done without a mouse using ctrl+click on Windows and Linux (usually), or cmd+click on macOS.
Two-finger tap also works on mobile Safari.
This is the piracy community, not the privacy one 🙃
I have plenty of RAM and I run Linux on a VM. Works like a charm. You can even use open source hypervisors like UTM.
I wouldn’t bother running it on bare metal just yet.
I do trust the devices on my network but I guess I’ll probably look into how to setup HTTPS.
This has the best explanation I’ve seen: https://sfconservancy.org/blog/2023/jun/23/rhel-gpl-analysis/
In particular, see the section “What Exactly Is the RHEL Business Model?”.
Or, if you want a short sentence to read only:
Whether that analysis is correct is a matter of intense debate, and likely only a court case that disputed this particular issue would yield a definitive answer on whether that disagreeable behavior is permitted (or not) under the GPL agreements.
The point is that it does not violate the GPL.
Yes. I just don’t know if it’s good to phrase it as “RHEL customers are legally allowed to share the code”, since as soon as they do it they won’t be allowed to be customers anymore lol (assuming Red Hat finds out)
It’s simple: they can redistribute it since it’s GPL, but if they do so, they break their business contract with RedHat, so they’re not customers anymore and can’t see the source code in the future.
GPL doesn’t mean that they must give the code to everyone, only that you have those rights as long as you have the software. So RedHat is not forced to have everyone as a customer, and according to them, distributing the code kicks you out.
They can still re-distribute the current source they have, but will not have access to future source code.
They are kind of low-res for my standards to be honest, but they are legible.
EDIT: thanks, OP, by the way!
That’s not how I understood it. I think saying “closed source” is kind of misleading.
The Arch Linux pipeline is real, folks.
There’s already a protest on Reddit. Marked as duplicate. Removed. /s
I despite this “trend” of considering just simple opinions and basic statements as “political”. It’s been watered down and turned into a meaningless tag.
I might actually end up disabling swap in the end. I wanted to update that apparently I “fixed” the problem (not sure if permanently) by turning off the pc, unplugging the PSU, and holding down the power button for 30 seconds. Normal reboots weren’t enough. I’ll take it for now.