Their knowledge stops at creating sway screenshots.

Not true. The current layout is the result of years of evolution based on feedback by typists and vendors.

I’m paranoid so I have created a physically separate network for the IoT stuff. Everything gets its IP from the same server from a /25. The lower is the trusted network, high IPs are not. IoT network devices cannot open connections to the other network. A bit awkward, but works fine.

I don’t see how VLANs would help OP.

ok: you never have the correct change, oftentimes you get changed short, takes up too much space, you have to balance between not carrying too little and not carrying too much, hard to track spending (can be your upside, i understand)

i believe that we need the option to use cache in society, but it sucks ass to actually use it day-to-day

but cash sucks

But any IP packet should trigger an arp “who has?”.

I would check this first too, seems a bit like it. Check your arp table for anything nasty.

I agree, people come here to learn. Don’t gatekeep information.

The first sentence is not really true though.

“Hey Bob, you did add a retry when you added that call to service X?

Umm, no?

Oh for fuck’s sake!”

All the fucking time.

Like every other Fowler article?

time to do some perf profiling

Connect using 2.4GHz, create own network with the 5GHz antenna?

USB wifi from Aliexpress?

How about doing your job instead of copypasting shit? Jeez.

Yeah, but it’s a proposal, so not really better that .lan.

There’s a draft rfc that defines “.home.arpa” as an internal. It looks stupid and totally misses the point, but works.

AFAIK it’s a planned feature for Forgejo

OpenSUSE maybe, if you don’t mind an other corporate overlord.