Yesterday I got feedback on my PR asking me to add more XML comments. The userId parameter of type Guid parameter didn’t have a param tag that said that it was the ID of the user. I was unable to convince them this was unnecessary and eventually conceded by adding a comment userId: ID of user.

Yes, but that is actually almost “incompatible with every app and website”

I really don’t get the WebP hate, it’s a good format. It’s better than PNG and JPG.

Hetzner Storage Share

People. Most people are still on GitHub and don’t see things on Codeberg / GitLab nor are they willing to create an account. It’s a classic case of the network effect.

I have a Forgejo instance with all my private repositories and use GitHub for my public repositories I want to share with others / collaborate on. I’m planning to switch to Forgejo / Codeberg for my public repositories when Forgefed has been implemented.

I tested it once and it didn’t really impress me. Perhaps you can try using something like Grist.

I mean, you could do it using foreign data wrappers.

EDIT: It has been done before https://www.cdata.com/kb/tech/excel-jdbc-postgresql-fdw-mysql.rst

There is actually an open source alternative for that in the Libreoffice suite called “Base”

“Building for Developers- Not imitators” | MongoDB

At MongoDB we believe in fair competition, open collaboration, and innovation that empowers developers. Our work has popularized the document database and enabled millions of developers to build modern, scalable applications that power some of the world’s leading companies. We welcome competition that drives progress and expands developer choice.

But that only works when everyone plays fair, which, unfortunately, isn’t always the case.

On May 16th, we asked FerretDB to stop engaging in unfair business practices that harm both MongoDB and the broader developer community. We believe that FerretDB has crossed two distinct lines:

…

F# is a decent introduction into functional programming. You can use .NET libraries and occasionally fall back to imperative code when needed.

It is not. The source is linked in the post.

The proposed text would not render as markdown and would be invisible when viewing it normally, it would be added in addition to the existing text. It would be used to store the rule list for clients specifically wanting a list until such a feature is added to Lemmy itself.

I don’t think that’s a good idea. There often is a very good reason for the report. I usually sent a DM asking the reporter to elaborate further.

Yes that would be the best solution imo. However, that would require changes to Lemmy (which usually take a while). Did you see the proposals in the linked issue?

That could also work. It’s certainly a lot simpler than my proposal in the GitHub issue.

I’ve just disabled all incoming connections (including SSH etc.) and access everything through WireGuard

Thanks for checking

Counterpoint

The VPS I’m using unfortunately doesn’t offer an external firewall