Oh, in the demo gif, that’s via a shortcut (holding power for half a second). Sorry, can’t help with wakeword there 😅

Very cool. I’ll definitely look into that, and let you know back here :D

Yeah, fair :)

Glad to be of service… 😄

did you consider metaphone matching?

I did not even know about this. Sounds super interesting. Though it seems to be very language specific?

My original intent was to not rely on language specifics. But maybe we could just define additional steps in the pipeline for specific languages. Hm. I’ll have to think about this some more, but it might definitely be a great idea for a future version, so thanks for telling me about it!!

Finally got this through another comment below. No, this should not be able to happen, unless you yourself have created a custom intent + shell script action in home assistant that runs this. The integration itself does not execute actions/scripts or the like, it just finds the closest string in a list of strings, and then hands that to the official conversation agent/Hassil.

…do you think I’m a bot, or what is this?

Edit: ohh, that’s what the original comment was. Sorry. “lange leitung” today.

Have fun, hope this works out for you! FYI: you can also use an LLM as an additional fallback (first closest-intent, then on failure, LLM). README mentions it further down on Github.

Please do! And if it does drive her crazy, please do open a bug report 😄

Yes, should be completely language agnostic. I’m not a linguist though, so take with a grain of salt 😅

There’s nothing language specific going on though, apart from a slight preference to split slots on word boundaries determined by spaces. So, might work a bit worse in e.g. Japanese.

❌ Sorry, I couldn’t understand that

Ahhh got it 😄 Yeah, I get/got similar stuff with Alexa. Honestly, the STT there is pretty impressive(ly fast), but sometimes it’s incredible nonsense.

I mean, you still need to activate the assistant with your usual wakeword. This/Hassil isn’t really intended to be constantly listening.

Or am I misunderstanding the question? 😅

Yeah. I think this is one of the best examples of letting nix do the hard stuff for you.

Neovim, configured entirely through nixvim. I always liked neovim, but it’s never been as incredibly stable as now with nixvim.

Main/only IDE both in private and at work. Can’t ever go back, muscle memory has ensured that.

I don’t really know, sorry :(

If you want to migrate, is going conduit - conduwuit - continuwuity (first version) - continuwuity (current version) maybe an option?

I went with continuwuity and am happy with it. Development happens at a steady pace, with sane priorities. The server is stable and I haven’t had any issues to speak of, despite one minor bug that got resolved very quickly after creating an issue.

If you use nixos, you basically have to know/learn/use day-to-day the nix language.

nixpkgs are written using nix the language, using concepts mostly familiar from just using nixos.

Basically everyone using nixos is capable of contributing packages.

Ah, sorry. https://repology.org/repositories/graphs

Just gonna leave this here

rmpc is great. But TUI, so not for everyone, I know.