

Basic allows something to be defined via itself? Or does it just initialise to random values like C?
Z=Z-Z looks wild, but if there are no special values for integers, it will always be zero, indeed
Rust dev, I enjoy reading and playing games, I also usually like to spend time with friends.
You can reach me on mastodon @sukhmel@mastodon.online or telegram @sukhmel@tg


Basic allows something to be defined via itself? Or does it just initialise to random values like C?
Z=Z-Z looks wild, but if there are no special values for integers, it will always be zero, indeed
My point was more along the lines that herbal doesn’t mean safe, mild, slow, etc
You seem to have had something like mint and thyme in mind as an example of herbal medicine, but try to substitute something like marijuana and nightshade to see that your description doesn’t fit all of the herbs. The only thing I agree is that effects often come coupled and you have to do something to isolate necessary ones.
The idea of setting aspiring goals sound good, but I mostly see it implemented in a way that you’re punished for doing that and encouraged by management to do that. So whatever you do, you’re not good, and nothing is done to address inconsistencies


I expect it’s not suited for kernel, yeah, but it sounds like a fun thing to try other than for kernel stuff


Sounds interesting:
Fennel is a programming language that brings together the simplicity, speed, and reach of Lua with the flexibility of a lisp syntax and macro system.


WindowsNT was POSIX compatible, afaik


I guess, the point was there’s nothing doing that in windows, and you will have to check manually or use an expensive M$ certificate


We have thought about this but we opted out, since we do not see all too much benefit from our side. Handheld stuff is not our major focus. Also, we had some concerns that this could get a “burocractic loophole”, which seemd to be more or less true so far.
Additionally, to us all this “initiative” locked like an emergency rushed thing, so that Bazzite finds new kernel maintainers and for other technical stuff after kicking the maintainer, which basically made most integration work for them
We neither want to be associated with “Playtron” too. There are more reasons, but Ill keep them out of the public
There could be theoretically a benefit in terms of specific patches for handheld devices. Antheas made there a really good job in creating and finding the proper patches, but since the person is not in Bazzite anymore and the rest seem not to have their experience.
Weve been working together with ChimeraOS and asus-linux since more then a year. Much testing and integration from inputplumber came from the CachyOS Handheld Edition too! :) I dont think for that a collective with strings attached is needed.
Wow, they took the joke much further than πthon


What is it that you’re trying to do then?


I guess that meant they blocked you


From the link:
Here, the Ubuntu developers roll out in-house universe security patches (additional backports of new patches against historical versions of the packages), which was previously not available
I’m not sure every package should be considered supported in LTS, so this not being available by default looks ok for me


Yeah, when the same API endpoint sometimes return a string for an error, sometimes an object, and sometimes an array, JSON doesn’t help much in parsing the mess


At least they don’t corrupt the memory like 101-pedes


My favourite ones are compiler optimisations based on impossibility of Undefined Behaviour, like this one: https://stackoverflow.com/a/78751225/1122720
And time travel, of course: https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20140627-00/?p=633


Yeah, I had in mind their office they changed every now and then to break compatibility with FOSS office, afaik this is not the only thing they did like that, but support for running old software usually was decent, true


A bit ironic when Microsoft struggles because someone else keep breaking compatibility. Although I would prefer it to keep trying because that would have been more choice and competition in the mobile OS land


Good point, I wonder if elasticity of demand will be affected by the AI bubble bursting (I expect there will be a recession and demand will get less elastic, bit I’m no economist)
Quality of output differs by a lot for local models, but I also think that local should be the way forward