

This endless separation into “managers” and “not managers” is so unproductive. Everyone manages something. That’s why you’re employed.


This endless separation into “managers” and “not managers” is so unproductive. Everyone manages something. That’s why you’re employed.
And in the darkness bind them?
Yes! Yeeeesss!
Let the distribution flame wars begin. Strike Zorin down with all your heart and forget that it is Linux and a move away from Windows.
Let the snake eat its own tail!!
Like we’re dumb!
Not like we’re smart!
Always tinkered with Linux, since eeeearly Red Hat days, but took the first full move when I set up my home lab and needed to host some docker containers with hardware pass-through.
Turned out my hardware was a bit too new for the kernel I had to install so ended up teaching myself a lot in terms trying to get everything to work.
Because of that I got quite comfortable on the terminal and from then, the UI suddenly made sense, because I understood better the concepts underneath.
Run three boxes with various versions of Linux now, a couple more if you count dual booting, a couple more if you count Mac as some kind of Frankenstein UNIX.

To securely, privately, rapidly download and store a variety of of Linux distributions. Almost all homelab is about downloading and storing Linux distributions.


Of course. But that wasn’t the complaint/satire of the satirist whose article we’re discussing.


Some topics are just complicated. If I write you a tutorial in fast Fourier transforms I can’t start the tutorial at 1+1=2.


So maybe the tutorial the satirist was satirising just wasn’t quite aimed at the satirist.


Help me understand what the author is trying to say, please. It could be I’m missing something. It just reads to me like the author feels everybody else has a responsibility to somehow make complicated topics easy.


Oh do grow up, frankly.
When I taught myself to program, there was no internet. You went and bought an enormous, 800 page book (usually written by Charles Petzold) and you hoped to Darwin something, anything would be understandable and lead you to move forward just a little bit.
If it’s worthwhile doing it’s hard.
Yeah, it’s a mess:
Ok, it’s a phone.
Alright, it seems to run Linux.
<EOF>
Eh, ok.


The CEO also looks underage, graduated last year after an internship with Microsoft. I can’t find any record of investment in the company or even any record of incorporation (to be fair I didn’t look very hard). The CEO and his whizz-kid AI coder may be the two smartest people on the planet - stranger things have happened - but statistically, and going by available data only, listening very much to a teenager (or thereabouts) hawking the skill of another teenager (confirmed) is a bit like watching two drunk kids in town thumping their chests.
For sure younger people will grow up to replace older people - such is the way of the world - and a salty coder is usually undertaken by fresh talent coming in with new skill sets (been on both sides of that), but right now, there’s nothing demanding attention here.


You must work in tech support with that attitude to the problem 🤣
The user has a problem. Do you want to be right or do you want a satisfied user? I can tell you which path popular operating systems choose.
And I say this 5 different OSes at home, 3 of which are Linux distros.


Not having them.
Once we were at zero warnings, we enabled warnings as errors, despite the protestation of the grognards on the team.
Depends on the age of the codebase, the age of the compiler and the culture of the team.
I’ve arrived into a team with 1000+ warnings, no const correctness (code had been ported from a C codebase) and nothing but C style casts. Within 6 months, we had it all cleaned up but my least favourite memory from that time was “I’ll just make this const correct; ah, right, and then this; and now I have to do this” etc etc. A right pain.
Yes, CTRL+Z undos, CTRL+S saves etc
Triggered much?