sverit
💻 M. Sc. in CS 🐕 Dog Person
- 0 Posts
- 20 Comments
It’s like naming your dog ‘Cat’.
3·1 year agoI have a Samsung Galaxy Book2 360 convertible because it can do the laptop stuff and the tablet stuff. With the Windows Subsystem for Android I even have that covered. Works pretty neat.
4·1 year agoLeaked photo of said anonymous channel:
Yep, that sould have been done by a PR person.
All of them were, that was my impression. Understandable, but that always gives a fake vibe, because everyone could have read that out loud. It’s very unpersonal. I would have preferred an open speech.
Honestly, that’s a much larger issue to me than the beef with GN. Forcing the image of a super cool liberal easy company while being as shitty as every other bigger greedy firm. So sad.
Wow, that really sounds like a horribly toxic experience :(
19·1 year agoSome attention hungry incompetent wannabes?
Yeah, that was super unprofessional :/
Follow up on Linus’ response from GN: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3byz3txpso
Followup on Linus’ response from GN: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3byz3txpso
My take on it:
We know that we’re not perfect. We wear our imperfection on our sleeves in the interest of ensuring that we stay accountable to you. But it’s sad and unfortunate when this transparency gets warped into a bad thing.
Yeah, well, that’s one of the main issues addressed in this video: You are not transparent about this, when you swap out videos without notice or bury corrections in a non-pinned comment.
Listing the wrong amount of cache on a table for a CPU review is sloppy, but given that our conclusions are drawn based on our testing, not the spec sheet, it doesn’t materially change the recommendation.
If the listing is wrong, who guarantees the lab tests on which the conclusion is based on are not wrong?
The thoroughness that we managed on our last handful of GPU videos is getting really incredible given the limited time we have for these embargoes.
Take the time it needs to produce correct reviews then. Who wants fast but false results?
We know that we’re not perfect. We wear our imperfection on our sleeves in the interest of ensuring that we stay accountable to you. But it’s sad and unfortunate when this transparency gets warped into a bad thing.
Yeah, well, that’s one of the main issues addressed in this video: You are not transparent about this, when you swap out videos without notice or bury corrections in a non-pinned comment.
Listing the wrong amount of cache on a table for a CPU review is sloppy, but given that our conclusions are drawn based on our testing, not the spec sheet, it doesn’t materially change the recommendation.
If the listing is wrong, who guarantees the lab tests on which the conclusion is based on are not wrong?
The thoroughness that we managed on our last handful of GPU videos is getting really incredible given the limited time we have for these embargoes.
Take the time it needs to produce correct reviews then. Who wants fast but false results?
Remember when they used an unlicenced version of OCCT commercially?
https://linustechtips.com/topic/1411603-ltt-is-stealing-software-from-occt-and-ignoring-his-emails/
291·1 year agoSorry, no question, only: Thank you for your hard work :)
10·1 year agoDoes anyone know if that’s ok with the DGPR in Europe?
deleted by creator