Also use seedvault but Im unsure if graphene still includes it. They kept bitching about how it sucked and they’ll make something better but not sure they ever did.

Ahhh that is good to know. Thank you.

I question why this gets recommended so much when we discuss truenas.

Without a doubt zfs is one of if not THE reason to go truenas. It does so much more for you than other filesystems.

I guess OMV at least has btrfs but not the same thing.

Gotify is not UP compatible still AFAIK. That’s why I went to ntfy.

Only caveat is that bookstack is very opinionated (even said so by its creator) so be sure it’s what you want.

Nah, yaml isn’t great by virtue of itself but with what it competes with. I far, far prefer it to any other BS. Json is garbage for human creation and obviously toml due to above. XML… Obviously just for machines.

Again, only good because of its competition.

True but… They’re not wrong.

Other systems don’t do this. Can do over a year without updating and it won’t be an issue at all.

Same. If I ever had to reinstall that makes it even easier anyhow.

I also think- how often am I borking or reinstalling my desktop?

It’s a good idea but I’ve been running the same system for years and years. All that effort goes kind of unused. I replicated most of what I’d need in a single ansible playbook over the years that didn’t take long. In the rare event I need to reinstall at all.

For real. I don’t use dash to dock and love gnome’s choices.

Well sure. I mainly meant FreeBSD. Thanks for clarifying.

Really good network stack. Linux is catching up surely but places like Netflix run a ton of stuff on BSD simply for that stack. AFAIK ebpf is supposedly the thing that will have Linux compete in this space- https://dev.to/dpuig/understanding-ebpf-a-game-changer-for-linux-kernel-extensions-4m7i

For a normal person? I’d argue there’s about zero benefit to running BSD over some Linux distro. Less people use jails compared to containers, networking doesn’t matter like you said, and hardware support is far more awful in terms of drivers. There’s a reason there’s like 2-3 desktop oriented distros on BSD compared to hundreds on Linux.

I’m not upset with anything proposed but I will say it’s very offputting they rotate between putting the person’s name first and the integration first when they list the improvements.

Just solidify the format. Back and forth is not easy at all to skim.

Built in Perl. Wow. Don’t see that much anymore.

Honestly it’s a testament to the devs that it mainly worked for most people as well as it did.

Like kudos to them. That was a huge, huge migration to a different library/format and they pulled it off.

Nice but id love if they supported jmap next.

That’s not my problem with them. My problem is with their arrogance assuming everyone has the same threat model or same desires when moving to an alternate os.

It’s easily the thing I dislike most about graphene.

Dnf5 is absolutely not slow.

Moreover, apt’s output is God awful. How hard is it to put each package on its own line when doing an upgrade? Its commands are also esoteric (Madison?)?

It works and I like Debian but apt is very Meh.

Fwiw, here’s a link to the recent issues- https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/issues/15045

A lot are fixed for this release. I would check that list and make sure none apply to you before upgrading. Always have a backup though of course.

Way too much for me to care. I admit gnome isn’t perfect but I’ll still argue it’s far more consistent than KDE.