Ah, thx for the explanation :)

Flatpak was designed to be decentralised, Flathub is just the main repository offering flatpaks and yes, probably 99% of all Flatpak applications are downloaded via the main repo but it is technically possible to just launch your own if you are unhappy with the main repo. The Flatpak team literally has this info page for hosting a repository

I for example, am taking AAGL from their own flatpak repo because they are not offering their launcher via the main one (even tho they also tell you to link the main repo - I guess for dependency reasons - but theoretically you could open your own repo and throw all dependency related packages in there or am I getting something wrong here)

Thx for sharing your story :3

Tysm for sharing your story :D

Interesting idea

Yeah, Mint too afaik with LMDE… 🤔

But a funny correlation indeed

Soon:

1. AmogOS
2. Hannah Montana Linux
3. Uwuntu
4. Nyarch
5. MX Linux

Ah, thanks for sharing your journey :D

Or AmogOS

I’m glad you found your Distro! :3

Oh nice! I remember my first one being Xubuntu but I have come a long way since then.

It’s a lightweight distro mainly for old or cheap hardware. It comes with a lot of tools pre-installed and is very conservative towards updates.

I mean, if it is just the client app you could see if the Flatpak version works better. ^^

Still more informative than every “Chrome Unboxed” article ever lol

Nice to finally meet you folks :3

I too had the thought that some people might mess around with the hpd numbers but I don’t want to make accusations without solid proof ^^

Definitely, but still those hit per day numbers gotta come from somewhere. There is of course the possibility to mess around here but I don’t want to make accusations out of the blue when there may be that huge fanbase that’s just keeping it low >.<

I feel guilty, I’ve downloaded it but haven’t played it yet :')

Sid Meier’s Civilization VI (or any other part)

• Flatpak is open source, Snap isn’t
• Flatpak allows other repositories besides the official one, therefore having the ability to be decentralised, Snap doesn’t
• Canonical (the company behind Snap and Ubuntu) is hated for some past decisions they made with Ubuntu
• and more

(The only thing I really prefer Snap over Flatpak is that you need the whole package name in Flatpak (like com.valvesoftware.Steam for Steam) whilst you can simply use “steam” in snap but that’s due to decentralisation vs centralisation I guess and overall a minor problem for me)