Peace be with you, F-Droid Community. 🌹

As many probably know, Google will block Android starting 2027.

Here is my hope: Google has shot itself in the foot with this Darth Vader move, because many People who loves privacy will now switch to de-googled systems, because ( Since to my knowledge), the blockade won’t affect those systems.

So this is just my Openion and my HOPE.

What’s your take on this?

And I kindly say to all developers: Please don’t register in Google.

There are so many people using de-googled systems now, including myself. Please keep going for us, and four you too. Please

Best wishes from Germany 🌹

  • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    because many People who loves privacy

    almost 12 of us … i jest but seriously, everyone using Apple and >90% of Android users don’t care. Google knows this and they just bang on about this being best for Android users to ameliorate any concerns around governance issues.

    Even many supposed staunch, so called privacy advocates, will complain they can’t change because banking or some such, so they stick with the status quo as every minor inconvenience is seen as an insurmountable wall.

    So i expect some bloviating initially and then acceptance. In 5 years, no shits given (headphone jack, expandable storage saw the same sort of thing)

    tl;dr press x for doubt (x)

    • pedroapero@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      You would be surprised. Google privacy practices have a bad press. I’m hearing random people saying they got a "de-googled’ phone at my local hairdresser. Also, the cheapest chinese model are not “Android-certified”, so potentially also de-googled.

  • Shanmugha@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Well, since I never took time to master phone magic, now they are going to give me a push. Thanks, I guess

    • Cleisthenian@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I started the journey about a year ago. Huge boon to my life even if I don’t work anywhere near tech.

    • sudoer777@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Ironically they’re the top government surveillance camera manufacturer where I live on deflock

  • dylanTheDeveloper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    How is this going to work for the companies that have internal only apps like time clocks or schedulers. Can they pay the fee and have their apps hidden from the PlayStore or are they all fucked?

    • dev_null@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      This isn’t stopping apps from outside the Play Store, internal apps can still be distributed internally (downloading an APK from a website for example). But these apps now have to be signed by a developer verified by Google. This happens by registering on Google Play, uploading the app, giving Google all the info, and then just not publishing the app on Google Play.

      • dylanTheDeveloper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Maybe i freaked out a bit too early. Still going to move away from Google Android personally but the business i work for is way too large to even attempt.

  • sudoer777@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I was doing Android development recently and apparently the official SDK builds needed to build the app aren’t FOSS, and actually FOSS versions are difficult to get. I still can’t wait until Linux phones are a thing, Android is such a shitshow nowadays and even GrapheneOS is still at the mercy of Google’s ecosystem. (also no aarch64-linux support for the build tools either)

  • Moonrise2473@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Don’t forget about the new automatic Google play services check that app developers can enable with a single click on build. That automatically blocks the app from working on any degoogled ROM

  • Newhere@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    So, did I understood correctly that just getting pixel with GrapheneOS is way out?

  • Steve@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    129
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I think you’re overestimating the de-Google community.
    I’d be astonished if there was 10 million of us. Compared to a few Billion normies, we’re a rounding error in their accounting.

    • Shanmugha@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Google still has all the opportunities to get a big “fuck you” instead of “line goes up”. Why? Because when they fuck up an app on someone’s phone that someone will have an option to switch away. Will everyone do it? No. But will enough people do it to send a wave of de-googling in motion? I hope so

    • vas@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      It’s not always about “winning”. Sometimes it’s about what you do and what you become while doing it. Do I want to be able to influence google directly? Yes. Do I need to? No. I just need a big-enough community that shares my values, and it’s OK for me that there’s an even bigger community nearby that shares something else.

      It’s important. We’re not doing an election.

    • CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Well, Chinese people have phones, and they don’t have Google either. Surely there is a way out of all this.

    • VeryInterestingTable@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      3 days ago

      A rounding error that many friends and family rely on for tech advice.

      I actually got surprised how quick people around me reacted to remove/avoid the tracker before sharing url links for example.

      • illi@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        3 days ago

        This is anecdotal, but yeah. I once mentioned this google thing to my wife. She was due to change her phone and once I explained she was like “I’d like to have what you have” so she is now on a refurbished Pixel with Graphene.

        • trilobite@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          I too coverted my wife to GOS and my son. I’ve been predicating the risks of surveilance for 6-7 years now. We are all happy people :-)

    • Professorozone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      A few billion? There are only 8 billion people on the planet and from what I understand, a few hundred don’t own phones and a few hundred more use Apple. I may be wrong.

    • melroy@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      Indeed. Users like us might think we are in larger amounts. But sadly enough we are the minority.

      Same with Linux.

      • vas@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Cheer up! It’s not an election, you don’t need to “win” against the evil by convincing everyone. If there’s a big-enough group around you, or even digitally around you, that share your values and your preferences here – that might just be enough. Even if you’d be alone, you could appreciate what you’re doing simply because it’s right. And you’re far from being alone.

        • melroy@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Yea true. Maybe it’s also a good thing to be the minority. It also has advantages like no IPO and stakeholders killing the products.

      • eldavi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        it’s the lack of awareness combined w the convenience of modern day bread & circuses that keep everyone ignorant.

  • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I tried to open up an issue (and did a PR) suggesting a developer strike as a tactic (IE open source devs adding their names to a list to promise to remove our apps from google play if developer ID goes through) on the KeepAndroidOpen repo. As a dev whose made many android apps and have them on both f-droid and google play, I thought this would mean something.

    The maintainers of that repo have been ignoring me to death since April. I was told by the maintainer that the project was “leaderless”, but in reality it seems they’re very opposed to a developer strike, otherwise my PR would’ve gotten more attention.

    • Flames5123@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Developers don’t want to strike because a strike means no pay because we are not unionized. It’s hard to unionize when it’s easy to find a new job for people. Our leverage is just leaving. But publishing on specific platforms don’t have that option.

    • vas@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      If you or somebody will create this initiative, please create a post about it on Lemmy! (Or ping me here if you’ll remember.) It’s a good initiative! Worth the attention. I’d also be curious to know which developers have committed to the strike and which haven’t.

      • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I don’t have the energy to start something and try to rally a bunch of devs, but I would join it.

    • loutr@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      3 days ago

      I work on an Android app for a small company. Google doesn’t care at all about Android devs except if you’re running a huge social media app or P2W game. I’m pretty sure they expect blowback from the OSS community and their plan is to simply ignore it.

      • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        There are some really popular FOSS apps for android, that are also on google play. Things like tasks.org , all the fossify apps, termux, joplin, ankidroid, thunderbird / k9, and many more.

        These being potentially removed from google play by developers due to a developer strike, would have more of an impact than KeepAndroidOpen’s current top strategy, which is for users to mass email their country’s regulators, which are easily ignored by either politicians or google.

    • CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Is there a change to an app in Google TOCs that can get folk to get app from F-droid?

      For example: “Free features for this app only available on play. New features and enhancements available (paid or) for free through f-droid.” Or if you cannot openly advertise in the app, “Visit our website to get enhanced features and updates” with clear documentation on how to install and permit f-droid and get app through there.

      That way, big app devs can create moves to f-droid, normalising it and chipping away at googles power. The more apps, the more legimate f-droid seems to normies.

      Ideally done as soon before switchover as possible. Even reach out to content creators.

      It moves from protest, to protest and solution.

    • 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Must be a US based/themed online “protest”

      “We want something to change”

      “We aren’t going to do anything drastic for the change”

      “Nothing changed? Oh well!”

      They almost always seem like a controlled opposition set up to make people believe, gain support (artificially at first to deter competeting protests that are more radical), but once it gets popular it doesn’t accomplish anything, won’t listen to ideas, input and feedback from the community and fold as soon as they aren’t required.

  • qyron@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’ll be serving as the tester for a de-googled phone, hopefully, next month for my family. If all works within expectations, we’ll be moving towards no google phone until the end of the year.

    I’ll be getting a Murena phone.

    • GreatWhiteBuffalo41@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      My brain just equates murena to Morena the birth control IUD and I have to pause to go wtf every time. I love that everyone is trying new things. That’s how we build better options.

    • AuroraShine@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      That’s great to hear. Good luck! I wish I could de-Google my family too.

      I’m currently testing /e/OS from Murena myself, but on a Fairphone 6, not a Murena device. The system itself is fine. Takes some getting used to, but no problem. Hope you enjoy it =D

      • Drekaridill@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I haven’t had any problem on my Fairphone 6 with eOS except Android Auto wont work without the Play Store installed. I do miss being able to split screen apps like I could in stock android, but that’s not exactly a “problem”

      • qyron@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        That is what I intend to get as well. But it would be welcome seing Murena widen their to the entire Gigaset line, like Volla as done.

    • CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      When this was initially announced, and they said they wouldn’t backtrack (which they have somewhat, for now), I actually did switch to an iPhone. I figured if Android was to be as closed as iOS I might as well try out iOS & see how it goes.

      Hardware-wise, holy shit it’s so nice, the device was bliss to use by comparison to my android phone.

      But having ads on youtube, having a shit browser (since literally every browser on iOS is a different skin of Safari), it’s so bad. I switched back to android in something like a month (my main use for my phone is watching youtube with Revanced).

      Mind you, I’m in the EU, Apple has set up the 3rd party thingy in such an inconvenient way & with so little incentives for developers that there is nothing outside of the Epic Games Store.

      If Android ever becomes like this, I think I might as well just switch back to a dumb phone.

      • lastweakness@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think my current phone will be my last normal Android phone. My next one will be either Linux, Graphene or iOS. In that order of preference.

        • grayclouds@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          What type of Linux phone? I am thinking of switching too, but I’ve heard Graphene OS is a pain to set up and it makes you seem like a drug dealer.

  • Zarxrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    Maybe I’m out of the loop, but shortly after Google announced this didn’t they backtrack and say they will let you install unapproved apps after changing a setting and waiting 24 hours?

    • ximtor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 days ago

      An afaik undocumented workaround isn’t exactly evoking trust, particularly coming from Google. Also wtf 24h cooldown to install shit on my own device?!

    • orc girly@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      They said that, but similarly with how they said they delayed switching their extension API after backlash (they’d break adblockers), they ended up doing it later on. That’s what they’re counting on here as well, unless there’s a lot of loud backlash and this hits their bottom line they will eventually eliminate that option down the line imo. They have every incentive to do so.

      • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        ^This.

        Even if there is immense push-back for this right now, they have told everyone what they want to (and eventually will) do. The wake up call we need to focus on is an alternative. A fully functional mobile FOSS OS (I personally hope for Linux, but honestly don’t want to restrict the options if there are others that would be better).

  • The Infinite Nematode@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 days ago

    I think it impacts any system running Google play services, even if you’re on GrapheneOS. Is that everyone else’s understanding too?

    • superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      3 days ago

      I can’t find the post, but I recall the Graphene developers saying this would not affect GrapheneOS because of the way they have play implemented. Play services on GrapheneOS is sandboxed, it does not have permission to enforce this check.

    • GreatWhiteBuffalo41@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Not fully what you’re asking but this was posted on their official Reddit

      Google has already had to change how they plan on implementing their blocking app installs from unregistered developers after a lot of backlash. “Sideloading” will still be possible, as we’ve all learned from recent news. The 24 hour wait does add some friction to the whole process, which is the point of course, but it’s far less bad than some people are trying to make it seem. 24 hours, then it’s over and the user is free to install apps as they please.

      This “sideloading” restriction is not even the biggest problem right now. Play Integrity is worse and does affect us directly. The effects of Play Integrity are showing up in multiple places, like now apps can’t be installed via Play Store, maybe Aurora in the future, apps refuse to run, Play Integrity verdicts are worse if an app was installed via another source than Play Store, and Automatic Protection has Play Integrity features being added. It’s a far bigger problem. It causes enough friction for some users that they give up on GrapheneOS or other non-GMS OSes to go back to whatever stock OS they had before, one complete with Google apps with privileged access and awful privacy. This other issue just got a lot more attention, and I’m guessing because it’s easier for people to fully understand.

      We have been in touch with EU regulators about Play Integrity and I hope that can continue in the future. Google isn’t going to change things because a small group of people are complaining. We need regulators to help with big issues. We need to find a way to make them understand what is happening. Play Integrity is a big example of them locking things down under the guise of “security.” Fixating on other smaller issues is, in my opinion, less effective and a waste of time and resources. The “sideloading” thing has enough attention and opponents to the change have had some success.

    • well for one, you don’t even need play services for all apps downloaded from the play store. and for another, even for the ones that do need it, play services run as an unprivileged sandboxed app, the same as any. so it can’t enforce anything google wants because it has zero control over anything.

    • AuroraShine@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Hey, honestly I don’t know much about GrapheneOS. I only know it’s available for Google Pixels. But you’re right. All Google-certified devices will be ‘locked down!’

    • Routhinator@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      You do not need to install Play services on Graphene. You can. You can also install MicroG, or you can skip both and use NextPush or ntfy.