• Shere_Khan@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    ITT: people trying to find legal loopholes to try and justify not paying digital artists for thier work

    • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      When you purchase a movie or show you’re still not paying digital artists. You’re paying some corporation who cooks their books to make profit disappear so they can keep it all for themselves. Have you not been following the writer/actor strike currently happening?

    • hightrix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      No one in this thread is trying to justify piracy. Everyone in this thread is rightfully saying that the comparison to theft is wrong.

      That’s it.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lol “digital artists.”

      Most pirated content is pornography. While I do consider those performers and creators “artists,” the victims of piracy are the corporations and production companies that sell pornography. This is an industry rife with corruption and exploitation. The artists actually benefit from the, ahem, exposure, and the same can be said for television, movie, and music industries. Artists want people to pay to experience their art, but artists are better able to sell their art when the artist is well known. GoT was the most pirated TV show at it’s peak popularity, and the creatos said it was better for viewership than winning an Emmy.

      Yes, piracy is analogous to stealing, semantics notwithstanding. But when art is a commodity, the capitalist, not the artist, is the primary beneficiary.