alphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 5 months agoMore confusion for recruiterssh.itjust.worksexternal-linkmessage-square7fedilinkarrow-up1127arrow-down16
arrow-up1121arrow-down1external-linkMore confusion for recruiterssh.itjust.worksalphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square7fedilink
minus-squarecalcopiritus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up26·4 months agoMake it strongly statically typed. Dictionaries and lists must have all their items of the same type. For extra confusion.
minus-squareMHanak@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·4 months agoEven better: make it purely functional
minus-squaredwraf_of_ignorance@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-24 months agoEven betterer: make it MOP(Monad Oriented Programming). IYou pray to a supreme being monad till your program works.
minus-squaremexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·4 months ago require compilation
minus-squarelad@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·4 months agoAnd tuples should have the same types inside. And dictionary keys should have the same type as that dictionary’s values 😈
Make it strongly statically typed. Dictionaries and lists must have all their items of the same type. For extra confusion.
Even better: make it purely functional
Even betterer: make it MOP(Monad Oriented Programming). IYou pray to a supreme being monad till your program works.
And tuples should have the same types inside. And dictionary keys should have the same type as that dictionary’s values 😈