You must log in or register to comment.
It’s really nice to see this RFC progress
I think this would be a nice improvement to reduce boiler plate.
Hmmm… I guess I don’t see why not?
This is really great and would solve the problem that led me to create constructor-lite.
With this RFC, its usage could be replaced with
#[derive(Debug, PartialEq)] struct Movie { title: String, year: Option<u16> = None, } assert_eq!( Movie { title: "Star Wars".to_owned(), .. }, Movie { title: "Star Wars".to_owned(), year: None }, )
Think you would need
Movie { title: "Star Wars".to_owned(), .. }
, the..
is mandatory.Thanks, that was an oversight on my part.