• Franklin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m somewhat conflicted on the entire matter. I felt like their quality was slipping for some time and it’s been difficult to watch them.

    Linus has handled almost every community crisis extremely poorly because when under pressure he gets defensive and speaks without thinking often pouring gasoline on the fire.

    At the same time I can understand his motivations as the livelihoods of his now very large number of employees depends on it.

    I think if LTT had responded officially and earnestly to the criticism addressing and laying out of roadmap for remediation it would have bought a lot of goodwill. I think Linux needs to be removed from LTT public relations but I don’t think that will ever happen.

    Truly a sad day, glad we have GN

    • hstde@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, for some time I felt the best videos from them where the infrastructure and server ones, just Jake and Linus united in chaos. The reviews in the other hand, as soon as you look at the graphs for more then the time they are shown, something felt off.

      • djshadow@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Totally agree about the infrastructure and server point. The house and upgrade videos are great too because of the chaos and personalities. I personally like the house videos because I have similar projects to centralize my PCs and have gone through some of those struggles. The reviews at this point are just a reminder that a new product is out and to do some research if it’s something I’m interested in.

    • Crunchypotat77@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      He kinda responded to it in a forum post. One paragraph about “improving processes and communication”.

      The rest was him doubling down on everything.

      He literally said that they auctioned the billet block and didn’t sell it. Like… what?! Are we playing semantics here?

      And he again emphasised that they didn’t want to “waste” the money to test the billet block properly, and he actually said that he didn’t want anyone to buy the billet block. In these exact words.

      • Franklin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Gross, they need to stop letting him speak for the company, his employees don’t deserve this.

      • Anonymousllama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        The wan show is arguably one of the better content pieces they put out. You actually get a good solid few hours of opinions and stories (and the occasional justification for their latest controversy)

      • snor10@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        How much revenue will be lost because of him running his mouth?

        Change up the show and don’t let him address criticism, simple as.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        As I said in another comment: Maybe remove a part of him from that and let WAN show be just a tech talk + community Q/A + anecdotes.
        Maybe every few weeks give the new CEO the questions that accumulated about business for the transparency Linus wants to show/talks about.

          • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Fair point. I meant it more in regards of anecdotes and past experiences and less in the way it evolved to.
            I think my communication and lack of english skill is hindering me in what I mean.

            Basically less of that and more of the other stuff that will cause less controversy.