Linux 7.2 has landed, dragging x86 timing clean out of the nineties by making the Time Stamp Counter mandatory.

I wrote up a quick article on why ditching those ancient legacy fallbacks is good housekeeping, plus a few other bits like cache-aware scheduling and memory tweaks worth noting.

Is anyone still using legacy hardware? If so, what do you use it for?

    • ferric_carcinization@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 hour ago

      major upgrade like from kernel 6 to 7

      What do you mean? The Linux kernel doesn’t follow SemVer.

      The 6.19 -> 7.0 version bump didn’t have any more inherent meaning than 7.0 -> 7.1 or 7.1 -> 7.2.

    • Canadian_Cabinet @lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Virtually nobody is going to run kernel 7.2 on a 90s CPU without a time stamp chip. Its good practice to prune old and largely unused features once and a while

    • GustavoM@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Why on earth you are still relying on 30+ year old CPU’s? Are you a supermarket owner on a third world country?

        • db2@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 minutes ago

          This happens every time I point put that losing these “old” kernel capabilities is in fact a loss.

          Let them be stupid about it, all the code still exists to undo these bad decisions one day. It’ll just be more work than it would otherwise be to fix what they broke.

          I put them in the same category as AI sycophants, they can’t see three feet beyond their own nose.